AP Reports That Noncitizen Voting Has Become a GOP Talking Point Even Though...
Greta Van Susteren Asks If Jake Tapper's the Right Choice to Be Moderating...
DA Kim Foxx Wouldn't Prosecute Over Drug or Weapons Found During a Routine...
CNN's Jim Acosta Points Out the Double-Standard of Colin Kaepernick Being Banned From...
Dr. Carol M. Swain Notes the Empty Space Where Robert E. Lee Statue...
Donald Trump Demands Drug Tests Before Debates With Joe Biden
The Biden Campaign Still Claiming Trump Told Americans to Inject Bleach
The Hill Earns Community Notes for Harrison Butker Headline
The Excitement for Biden is Palpable as POTUS' Motorcade Moves Through Atlanta
And You Thought OUR Congress Was Chaotic! Watch Taiwan Parliament Member STEAL Bill...
'Extremely Concerning': X Reacts to SCARY Study About Suicide Risk Following Gender-Affirm...
Sen. Brian Schatz Goes to the Land of Make Believe to Create Scenarios...
Has the Left Gone Too Far? Bill Maher Once Again Moves Toward the...
UH OH: Most Recent Apple iPhone Update Restores Deleted Pics, Leading to MAJOR...
Dem House Leader Says Congress Needs to Consider Legislating SCOTUS (Who Wants to...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement