Bias? What bias? Would Reuters pull this B.S. with liberal SCOTUS justices?

I mean yes he is a conservative leaning judge.. But to characterize his position as "far right" seems an attempt to sensationalize this…

— Peter Alexander Dalglish (@padalglish) June 26, 2017

Reuters seems to be having some trouble processing  Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch’s conservatism:

Trump appointee Gorsuch takes far right positions on U.S. high court https://t.co/8jg8cJdzRv

— Reuters (@Reuters) June 26, 2017

“Far right”?

Is our Constitution represents far right?

— Juliana Stone? (@Ay4Juliana) June 26, 2017

The MSM's definition of upholding the Constitution/ law is "far right" https://t.co/euggMAOeSK

— WhigsnTwigs (@WhigsnTwigs) June 26, 2017

C’mon, Reuters. You guys could at least try to appear objective. Just a little bit.

https://twitter.com/rorycooper/status/879490095362998272

I’m looking for your similar descriptions of Sotomayor but can’t find them.

— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) June 26, 2017

Weird… https://t.co/DEWiBCIYHj

— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) June 26, 2017

Curiouser and curiouser… https://t.co/1M9eWzuBxz

— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) June 26, 2017

Oh well. If Reuters was trying to make us uneasy about Gorsuch, mission NOT accomplished.

The good news keeps coming. https://t.co/V26s9o2Qsk

— jon gabriel (@exjon) June 26, 2017