Dems Say Trump's Shattering Political Norms and Trying to Intimidate SCOTUS Justices
The 1962 Supreme Court Decision That Banned School Prayer
Sen. Amy Klobuchar Tries to Take a Jab at Trump Over Gas Prices...
'Stupid, Narcissistic Idiot': Victor Davis Hanson Recalls His Own Fang Fang Story to...
Eric Swalwell Runs to MS NOW and Claims the FBI Dropping Fang Fang...
Eric Swalwell in 2023: Don’t Take His Word He Did Nothing Wrong With...
The Rig Picture: Nancy Pelosi Warns That Trump Is Planning to Hack Our...
Hacked? UK Home Office Promises Grooming Gangs Inquiry, No More Policing of Social...
Celebs Sign Open Letter Demanding ICE Detention Facility Holding Children Be Shut Down
David French Says Trump Is the Worst Free-Speech President of His Lifetime
The TDS Crowd and Lib Media Do NOT Like Trump and Hegseth's Response...
LGBTQ Crowd Lobbies Worcester City Council to Become a 'Sanctuary City for the...
New Law Forces Boise Mayor to Take Down Pride Flag From City Hall
Rubio Tuesday
Voters Don't Love Republicans — But They're Terrified of Democrats

BACKFIRE! WaPo's attempted exposé on Brett Kavanaugh only exposes media's PATHETIC hackery

With Brett Kavanaugh’s SCOTUS confirmation looking pretty inevitable, media firefighters have gotta pull out all the stops to try and stop it. Here’s today’s effort from the Washington Post:

Advertisement

More from the Washington Post:

Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a strikingly explicit 1998 memo that he was “strongly opposed” to giving then-President Bill Clinton any “break” in the independent counsel’s questioning about his sexual relationship with intern Monica Lewinsky, according to a document released Monday.

In the memo, Kavanaugh, who worked as an associate counsel for independent counsel Ken Starr and is now President Trump’s nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, laid out several proposed questions, including, “If Monica Lewinsky says that you inserted a cigar into her vagina while you were in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?”

The memo was written Aug. 15 to Starr and “All Attorneys,” with the subject line: “Slack for the President?” It was Kavanaugh’s advice for the type of questioning for Clinton that would occur by Starr’s associates, who were trying to determine whether the president had committed perjury in a civil suit.

“After reflecting this evening, I am strongly opposed to giving the President any ‘break’ in the questioning regarding the details of the Lewinsky relationship” unless he “resigns” or “confesses perjury,” Kavanaugh wrote, continuing: “He has required the urgent attention of the courts and the Supreme Court for frivolous privilege claims — all to cover up his oral sex from an intern. He has lied to his aides. He has lied to the American people. He has tried to disgrace you and the Office with a sustained propaganda campaign that would make Nixon blush.”

Advertisement

Can you guys believe that Brett Kavanaugh would’ve asked sexually explicit questions about a man who did sexually explicit things in the Oval Office? Quick! Fetch us our pearls so we can clutch them! We must clutch our pearls! 

It’s almost as if the Washington Post is trying to make Brett Kavanaugh the bad guy here.

https://twitter.com/rhetorical_rory/status/1031610808239894528

Welp.

Advertisement

One would think.

Yep. It really does seem like media outlets have decided it’s worth shedding any semblance of objectivity because taking Brett Kavanaugh down is such a noble cause.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement