Berate and Debate: CA Gubernatorial Hopeful Katie Porter Claims She Apologized to Cussed...
Three Year Letterman Gives Props to Euroweenie Who'll Never Visit This Barbaric Country...
Clueless Columnist Asks If It’s Now a Crime to Expose White Supremacist Groups
Check Out the Twisted Wording of Virginia's Gerrymandering Referendum
Hasan Piker Joins the NYT to Talk About ‘Microlooting’ as Political Protest
Howard Kurtz: The Kash Patel ‘Scandal’ Would Have Been a Two-Day Story Had...
RFK Jr. Absolutely Torches Sen. Warnock: 'One Person Can Handle 1-3 Rabies Cases...
Here's a Classic Earth Day Flashback of Greg Gutfeld Giving Tugboat Phil a...
With Kash Patel Closing in on the SPLC, Judiciary Dems Want Him to...
ACLU Says DC Curfew Puts Kids at Risk of Unnecessary Encounters With Police
All Is Halted! Virginia Judge Declares Narrow Redistricting Vote Unconstitutional, Blocks...
The Polite Right's Fatal Flaw – DeSantis and Rufo Show How to Fix...
Rumor: The Talarico Camp Is Sitting on Career-Ending Dirt on Both Paxton and...
Reporter Asks Ilhan Omar About Her Curious Financial 'Adjustment' (Brace for Smug Head...
Sen. Chris Murphy Loses It Over Trump Sending 1,000 Afghan 'Heroes' to the...

Merrick Garland refuses to admit that biological male prisoners could pose risk to female prisoners

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is testifying today at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, and in doing so is helping to remind us why we can’t stand him.

Advertisement

Transcript:

Lindsey Graham: “When it comes to federal prisons, are you aware that 1200 prisoners are requesting to be sent from a male prison to a female prison?”

Merrick Garland: “I’m not, no.”

Graham: “OK. Um, what is our policy when it comes to allowing a male prisoner to be transitioned into a female prison?”

Garland: “Uh, I think, uh, if you’re generally asking the question of how, um, trans people are dealt with in the Bureau of Prisons, my understanding, um, is that these are, uh, determinations about, um, uh, where they’re placed or where people are placed in general have to do with individualized determinations regarding the security of that individual, um, and the management of the prison, these are done on a case-by-case basis. That’s my understanding.”

Graham: “Are you aware of any policy guidelines that they use to make that determination?”

Garland: “I think there is a policy guideline along the lines that I just said, that, that, they are …”

Graham: “I would like for the Bureau of Prisons to send it to us. Are you concerned that if a biological male was sent to a female prison, that could be a risk to female prisoners?”

Garland: “I think every, uh, uh, person in prison has to be dealt with, uh, with dignity and respect. Uh, that determinations of the safety questions you’re talking about have to be made on an individualized basis.”

Advertisement

We get that the “Hon.” in front of his name is kind of the way these things are done, but truth be told, there’s nothing remotely honorable about Garland’s position.

Nailed it.

It’s not an answer. But it still says a lot about Garland. And none of it’s good.

We’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: We really dodged a bullet when the Senate GOP filibustered his SCOTUS nomination.

***

Related:

American Medical Association asks Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into those coordinating threats against children’s hospitals

Advertisement

***

Join us in the fight. Become a Twitchy VIP member today and use promo code SAVEAMERICA to receive a 40% discount on your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement