Bishop Robert Barron ENDS Carrie Prejean Boller's 'Preposterous' Antisemitic Claims in Kin...
A GIDDY Tom Homan Tells CNN's Dana Bash How READY ICE Is to...
Mike Lee DISMANTLES Dems' MUH CONSTITUTION Anti-SAVE Act Talking Point With Their Own...
A Dem So Bad Even Mark Kelly Doesn't Like Her? WOOF: DESPERATE MI...
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani Leads Public Prayer in Prospect Park
British MPs Call for Investigation of Member Who Called Mass Public Muslim Prayers...
Cato Director Says It’s ‘Totally False’ That Noncitizens Get Welfare at Double the...
Minnesota City Bringing Back the Old, ‘Problematic’ State Flag
Jim Acosta Whines to Adam Schiff at Pretend Hearing About Trump and MAGA...
WSJ: Boom in Autism Therapy Is ‘Medicaid’s Fastest-Growing Jackpot’
AOC Needs More Than Therapy: $19K in Donor Money for Ketamine Shrink
MAGA Allegedly Mad at The Pitt for Portraying Very Realistic Scene of ICE...
The Bulwark’s Tim Miller Asks James Talarico About the Size of ‘God’s Sausage’
Match Day 2026: Celebrating the Joy, Questioning the System – Time to Prioritize...
Polymarket's Meme Bar Fails Spectacularly – TVs Down, Vibes Crashed, Situation Unmonitored

Sports Illustrated explains how SCOTUS ruling upholding HS football coach's right to pray on-field could erode 'a bedrock of American democracy'

It’s SCOTUS decision time. So, naturally, Sports Illustrated is there to break it down for us.

They’re specifically interested in the case of public high school football coach Joe Kennedy, who walked out onto the field at a game one night and dropped to his knees in prayer, by himself. According to Sports Illustrated, a ruling in his favor could singlehandedly erode a bedrock of American democracy:

Advertisement

More from Sports Illustrated:

Kennedy insisted then and maintains now that he didn’t want any attention. That he desired only to pray, by himself, briefly, right there, as he had done after every game for eight seasons until the school told him that fall he had to stop. And that, despite his leadership role overseeing impressionable teenagers, his actions weren’t intended to coerce anyone.

His opponents say his intentions don’t matter, and, if they did, this scene was his creation, anyway. Kennedy had spent those previous six weeks conducting multiple interviews that exacerbated his conflict with the school. Two weeks before the game, he had retained First Liberty, the powerful Christian conservative law firm, in his burgeoning legal battle against the district. And he intensified the spotlight’s glare before kickoff with a pregame Facebook post, announcing a big night upcoming. In signing off, he asked for prayers.

He asked for prayers? Why wasn’t he locked up right then and there?

Advertisement

More:

Regardless, the coach makes for an unlikely figurehead in these legal theatrics. He was aimless for most of his 53 years. For decades, he wasn’t religious at all, and he isn’t overtly so now. He never followed football all that closely. And yet, he is now at the center of a seven-year legal conflict that started with that covenant—to pray after every game. That morphed into a controversy, then a circus, then a lawsuit centered on the First Amendment and its clauses. That broadened into a political brawl. That widened into a culture-war cudgel. And that wound through the court system, until case No. 21-418 landed on the docket for the Supreme Court of the United States.

Kennedy’s life is now part of the public domain, an emblem to be viewed, utilized and manipulated for others’ aims. He’s a human embodiment of a country that’s deeply divided; a religious movement that’s surging with momentum, even as organized religion becomes increasingly less popular; and, most of all, a powerful right-wing machine many say is employing a timeless division tactic: us vs. them. All morphed a man’s unremarkable existence into an extraordinary one and imbued Kennedy with elusive, far-reaching purpose. He’s no longer just a man. He’s now a symbol, for what his supporters term “religious freedom.”

Advertisement

“What his supporters term ‘religious freedom.'” So … religious freedom, then.

That is effectively what Sports Illustrated is attempting to argue.

It means whatever the hell Sports Illustrated wants it to mean.

But we do not think it means what Sports Illustrated thinks it means.

We’d be embarrassed for Sports Illustrated if this were a one-off for them, but they’ve been playing around in the political kiddie pool for several years now and clearly haven’t learned their lesson. So that’s on them.

Advertisement

The First Amendment even extends to Sports Illustrated. They have the right to make complete asses of themselves as often as they like. Which seems to be pretty often these days.

Advertisement

Maybe someone should pray for Sports Illustrated.

Pray that they get their priorities straight.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos