'What a Monster'! NY Times Shredded Again for Spin on What Trump's Christmas...
ANOTHER Rhode Island Dem Tried Playing the 'Do You Know Who I Am'...
WOW: Minnesota Lt Governor Peggy Flanagan Takes Somali-PANDERING to a Whole New Level...
Lefties Sink to Sick, New Low Sexualizing Eight-Year-Old on Christmas to Attack Trump
ABC News Reports Trump Has Ruined These Illegals Aliens' American Dreams (During the...
He No Grammar GOOD: Hakeem Jeffries' Attempt at Shaming Repubs Who 'COULD' Care...
AMEN! Robby Starbuck Drops BIBLICAL Fact-Check on Eric Swalwell for Exploiting Christmas t...
The American Have It COMING? Ann Coulter NUKES the NYT for Shameful Headline...
HA! Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons to Explain What ILLEGAL Means...
Merry Christmas to All Including the Dead Terrorists: U.S. Airstrikes Target ISIS in...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
ProPublica: Expectant Mother Forced to Eat Clay and Charcoal Due to US Aid...
City of Minneapolis Says Plans for George Floyd Square Are Moving Forward
John Pavlovitz: Christians Who ‘Weaponize’ Christmas Are an Insult to Jesus
ABC News: Glaciers Could Disappear in Coming Decades, According to 'New Research'

Brace for backfire: If Twitter's trying to punish Trump with this move, they're in for a rude awakening

Jack Dorsey is committed to making Twitter a better place for everyone, even if it means effectively killing Twitter:

Advertisement

More from Twitter’s blog:

Our highest priority is to protect the health of the public conversation on Twitter, and an important part of that is ensuring our rules and how we enforce them are easy to understand. In the past, we’ve allowed certain Tweets that violated our rules to remain on Twitter because they were in the public’s interest, but it wasn’t clear when and how we made those determinations. To fix that, we’re introducing a new notice that will provide additional clarity in these situations, and sharing more on when and why we’ll use it.

Serving the public conversation includes providing the ability for anyone to talk about what matters to them; this can be especially important when engaging with government officials and political figures. By nature of their positions these leaders have outsized influence and sometimes say things that could be considered controversial or invite debate and discussion. A critical function of our service is providing a place where people can openly and publicly respond to their leaders and hold them accountable.

With this in mind, there are certain cases where it may be in the public’s interest to have access to certain Tweets, even if they would otherwise be in violation of our rules. On the rare occasions when this happens, we’ll place a notice – a screen you have to click or tap through before you see the Tweet – to provide additional context and clarity. We’ll also take steps to make sure the Tweet is not algorithmically elevated on our service, to strike the right balance between enabling free expression, fostering accountability, and reducing the potential harm caused by these Tweets.

Advertisement

Isn’t that thoughtful of them?

That may be what they’re going for … but when it inevitably backfires, they’ll only have themselves to blame.

There’s that, and then there’s this:

Dorsey and Twitter aren’t mentioning Donald Trump by name, but is there honestly anyone who doesn’t think they had Trump in mind when they came up with this?

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement