From Our Singed, Smoked Hands! Nithya Raman Wants to Ban Backyard BBQs in...
Treacherous RAT: James Woods Putting John Thune on BLAST Over the SAVE Act...
'Promises Made, Promises BROKEN': Intl. Association of Fire Fighters Just Ripped Spanberge...
Trump Strong Arms Traitors to Their Faces
Think Fairfax DA Descano's Testimony Was Bad? You Ain't Seen NOTHIN' Yet: Check...
WATCH How Fairfax Co Prosecutor Warned About Mother-Murdering Illegal REACTS When Pressed...
'Beyond Parody': Jen Psaki Finds It Very Problematic That Trump's Son Accompanied Him...
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT! Unhinged Loon Who Literally Owes His Win to Abigail Spanberger...
BOOM! Squatter Steve Cohen EVICTED After 20 YEARS in Discriminatory TN Seat —...
Prog Account Made a 'Stunning Admission' in Clip of JD Vance Describing What...
After Yet ANOTHER Loss, Marc Elias Begs for X to Financially Support His...
Gavin Newsom Brags About How Much Calif. Spends Per Student but Will NOT...
Nick Minock Wasn't ABOUT to Let Fairfax DA Descano Pretend He Gave a...
Dem Tim Walz Calls Limping Shooting Victim Steve Scalise ‘Boot Licker’ for Online...
Adam McKay Calls Out White Liberals, There's Only One Problem

'This is super gross': Slate writer torched for her 'offensively terrible' take on Pete Buttigieg's white male gayness

We already know that gay conservatives aren’t allowed to be a thing. But according to Slate’s Christina Cauterucci, for one, gay liberals can be problematic as well. If they’re white males, that is. According to Cauterucci, it’s great that Pete Buttigieg is gay and all, but the fact that he’s an educated white male ultimately means he’s the wrong kind of gay:

Advertisement

Here’s Cauterucci’s definitive conclusion:

To me, a queer woman, it seems hard to argue that the presidential run of this apotheosis of respectability politics is a major win for diversity. Buttigieg’s perception of queer sexuality as a not-sinful but ultimately unimportant distinction—“like having brown hair,” his coming-out essay said—doesn’t make him less gay. It does, however, put some distance between him and the queer communities he’s getting credit for being the first to represent. And if I’m being cynical (or just honest), it probably makes him more electable.

Straight white male voters will likely find it easier to see themselves in Buttigieg than in the women or people of color in the 2020 field. They’ll be right to do so: Buttigieg’s life experiences—how he’s been perceived, how he’s gotten paid, what he’s believed himself capable of, what opportunities have been available to him—almost certainly have far more in common with those of Sanders and Biden than those of Harris, Booker, and Warren. That’s not to say he won’t face challenges and stereotypes specific to his sexuality, or that he hasn’t overcome obstacles he’s chosen not to share. Homophobia still exists. As Buttigieg has correctly pointed out in town halls and interviews, LGBTQ people can still legally be fired for the mere fact of their identity in most U.S. states. But in a primary for the overwhelmingly pro-gay Democratic Party, Buttigieg can be more accurately lumped in with his white male peers than with anyone else.

Advertisement

Heh.

Absolutely nothing. But there’s definitely something wrong with Cauterucci’s take, which is why she’s taking heat from all sides:

Advertisement

Ain’t identity politics grand?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement