Chicago City Council Gets Advice From Teens on Preventing Teen Takeovers
Water Log: Jim Acosta Vies for ‘Swimmy’ Award in Aquatic ‘Journalism’ With Latest...
DOJ Charges 455 Fraudsters in $6.5 Billion Billing Scheme
Meek Streak: Michelle Obama Says Her Humble Hubby Hates That His Presidential Library...
Zohran Mamdani Spotted a 'Fundamental Constitutional Right' That Nobody Else Can Find in...
Families of Jailed Antifa Terrorists Are Livid, Say Government Lied to Prosecute Innocent...
Doomsday Bouquet: NRCC Gifts Flowers to Dem Jeffries for Being So Blooming Wrong...
Sen. Ted Cruz Looks at NY Election Results, Declares 'Rich Children Like Playing...
Perpetual PhD Parasite: 7th-Year Student Can't Afford NYC, Runs for Congress to Live...
The Guardian: Texas Protesters Received Unusually Harsh Sentences in Crackdown on Dissent
ICE to Fine Attorney for Filing Dozens of False Asylum Claims on Behalf...
Sydney Gallego Tries to Defend Hubby Ruben, Katie Miller Brings the Receipts and...
Brian Allen’s Heartwarming Interfaith Moment: Three Grifters United by the One True Faith...
The Dangerous Fallacy: ‘Exposing’ Radical Leftists Won’t Save Us — Their Voters Are...
NY Congressional Nominee Founded Group Whose Goal Was Total Eradication of Western Civiliz...

'This is super gross': Slate writer torched for her 'offensively terrible' take on Pete Buttigieg's white male gayness

We already know that gay conservatives aren’t allowed to be a thing. But according to Slate’s Christina Cauterucci, for one, gay liberals can be problematic as well. If they’re white males, that is. According to Cauterucci, it’s great that Pete Buttigieg is gay and all, but the fact that he’s an educated white male ultimately means he’s the wrong kind of gay:

Advertisement

Here’s Cauterucci’s definitive conclusion:

To me, a queer woman, it seems hard to argue that the presidential run of this apotheosis of respectability politics is a major win for diversity. Buttigieg’s perception of queer sexuality as a not-sinful but ultimately unimportant distinction—“like having brown hair,” his coming-out essay said—doesn’t make him less gay. It does, however, put some distance between him and the queer communities he’s getting credit for being the first to represent. And if I’m being cynical (or just honest), it probably makes him more electable.

Straight white male voters will likely find it easier to see themselves in Buttigieg than in the women or people of color in the 2020 field. They’ll be right to do so: Buttigieg’s life experiences—how he’s been perceived, how he’s gotten paid, what he’s believed himself capable of, what opportunities have been available to him—almost certainly have far more in common with those of Sanders and Biden than those of Harris, Booker, and Warren. That’s not to say he won’t face challenges and stereotypes specific to his sexuality, or that he hasn’t overcome obstacles he’s chosen not to share. Homophobia still exists. As Buttigieg has correctly pointed out in town halls and interviews, LGBTQ people can still legally be fired for the mere fact of their identity in most U.S. states. But in a primary for the overwhelmingly pro-gay Democratic Party, Buttigieg can be more accurately lumped in with his white male peers than with anyone else.

Advertisement

Heh.

Absolutely nothing. But there’s definitely something wrong with Cauterucci’s take, which is why she’s taking heat from all sides:

Advertisement

Ain’t identity politics grand?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement