Kamala's 'Climate Engagement Director' Ran Group That Pushed Gas Stove Bans (Does Kamala...
Pathetic Toadies at WaPo Erase Negative Headline About Kamala Harris' Horrific Treatment o...
Hamas Sympathizer: Tim Walz Calls for Two-State Solution in Middle East, Applauds Proteste...
She's SO BAD at This: Listen As Kamala LITERALLY READS FROM A SCRIPT...
FACT CHECK: John Fugelsang Gets Nuked From Orbit After Saying Gun Violence Only...
Liz Cheney Announces More Endorsements and ALL This Might End Up in a...
WATCH: CBS Reports on the 'Imaginary' Venezuelan Gangs Taking Over Aurora, CO Apartments
'Up in Flames'! Trump Sentencing Announcement in NY Is Latest Sign the Left's...
LOL, NO: The Guardian Warns 'We Each Have a Nazi in Us' (But...
Surprise! These Venezuelan Gang Members Arrested in CO Had Something Else in Common
Trump Lawyers Debunk Entire Case Against Trump in Less Than Seven Minutes
'Come On!' Dana Perino NOT Buying Harris Spox's BS Spin About Lack of...
Here's the 'Most Telling' Part of the August Jobs Report the Dems Won't...
AP Deleted Their Bogus JD Vance Misquote AFTER It Served a Narrative Purpose...
Here's an Incomplete List of Issues Where the Harris Campaign Is Lying About...

Forgetting something? MarketWatch serves up 'remarkably stupid' take on restaurant costs

We’re not quite sure how to preface this incredibly hot take from MarketWatch, so we won’t preface it with anything. Instead, we’ll just plop it right here so you can check it out for yourselves:

Advertisement

See what we mean? How do you even begin to introduce something like that?

Like, you don’t even need to be a brilliant economist to know why that’s terrible.

https://twitter.com/TonyGrisafi1/status/980191705768124416

The article, which they for whatever reason decided to reheat after originally publishing it in early April of last year, does mention this:

Advertisement

To be fair, every time you dine at a restaurant, you’re paying for more than just the food. About 30% of restaurant revenue goes to labor costs, 30% goes to general overhead and 30% is spent on the actual ingredients, according to PlateIQ. That means that restaurants still need to mark up ingredients by an average of 300% to break even.

Which raises the question: What was the point of the article? That restaurants charge more for food than the ingredients cost? Because we’re pretty sure everybody already knew that.

We’ll leave you with this:

Oof.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement