Ratio Machine Elizabeth Warren Rake Stomps While Pitching All the 'Free' Stuff a...
LGBTQ ... WTAF? Annapolis Cares About Emergency Preparedness, But Only for SOME of...
Viral World Cup German Freddy Milkshake-Ducked for Supporting Israeli Hostages
Trump WH Statement Puts the Left's Domestic Terrorist Goon Squads on Notice While...
These Optics While Joe Biden Brags About Efforts to Kill the Oil Industry...
Algerian Fans Declare War on Messi in Allah’s Name — He Answers with...
Trump Forces Thune's Hand: Leadership Challenged Over SAVE Act?
FAFO: Judge Hannah Dugan’s Felony Conviction for Shielding Illegal Immigrant from ICE Offi...
Here's a Poll About Flying the American Flag on the 4th of July...
Doctor Who’s 'Been Everywhere' Declares American Groceries Trash, Gets Schooled on Cool AC...
Do Nothing Ivy League PhD, Broke in NYC, Hates Jews: The Perfect Democrat...
'They’re Terrible People Who Don’t Love America' — JD Vance Goes Nuclear on...
Al Gore's Attempted 'Right All Along' Brag Collapses Under the Weight of its...
POPCORN! Watch Hillary Clinton Absolutely SQUIRM When Pressed to Comment About Graham Plat...
Mommy's Little Senator: 37-Year-Old Texas Dem Talarico Shares a Checking Account With His...

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement