Marc Elias’ Interpretation of SCOTUS VRA Decision Is Intellectually Dishonest and Wrong
Local News Says FBI Used a Battering Ram to Raid a Daycare in...
She Seems Nice: Seattle’s Socialist Nepo Mayor Cackles 'BYE' as Wealth Flees Her...
Obama Already Knows the Motive for Today's SCOTUS Ruling, Still Looking for WHCD...
Sen. Raphael Warnock: SCOTUS Has Gutted the Protections Civil Rights Protesters Spilled Bl...
Florida State Rep. Storms House Aisle With Bullhorn to Rage Against New District...
The View Panelists Quickly Became James Comey's Lawyers When Alina Habba Said the...
Cluck Around and Find Out: Why Rotisserie Chicken on SNAP Went Full Slippery...
Supreme Court: No More Racial Gerrymandering; Mehdi Hasan: Time to Rig the Court...
Tim Walz Tried to Save His Career But Kash Patel Made Him Regret...
'No Radical Footprint': NPR Dismisses WHCD Shooter’s Manifesto Because It Read Like MSNBC...
Scott Jennings Exposes the $200 BILLION Scam Machine Targeting Your Parents
Florida House Overwhelmingly Passed DeSantis' New Congressional Maps and the Dems Did NOT...
Rosa DeLauro Said the Most Anti-Science Thing Ever to Lee Zeldin During Purple...
Left: 'Trump Must Lower the Temperature!' Wajahat Ali: Literally Begs Trump to Die...

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement