Jimmy Kimmel's Humiliating Christmas Tantrum Gets Dwarfed by Trump
Harry Sisson Proudly Shows the World How Broken He Is With His TDS...
'What a Monster'! NY Times Shredded Again for Spin on What Trump's Christmas...
ANOTHER Rhode Island Dem Tried Playing the 'Do You Know Who I Am'...
WOW: Minnesota Lt Governor Peggy Flanagan Takes Somali-PANDERING to a Whole New Level...
Lefties Sink to Sick, New Low Sexualizing Eight-Year-Old on Christmas to Attack Trump
ABC News Reports Trump Has Ruined These Illegals Aliens' American Dreams (During the...
He No Grammar GOOD: Hakeem Jeffries' Attempt at Shaming Repubs Who 'COULD' Care...
AMEN! Robby Starbuck Drops BIBLICAL Fact-Check on Eric Swalwell for Exploiting Christmas t...
The American Have It COMING? Ann Coulter NUKES the NYT for Shameful Headline...
HA! Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons to Explain What ILLEGAL Means...
Merry Christmas to All Including the Dead Terrorists: U.S. Airstrikes Target ISIS in...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
ProPublica: Expectant Mother Forced to Eat Clay and Charcoal Due to US Aid...
City of Minneapolis Says Plans for George Floyd Square Are Moving Forward

Richard Grenell has a couple of objectively good questions after Chris Hayes declares that 'Trump is objectively pro-Covid'

As Twitchy told you, everyone’s favorite tear-stained-sweater-wearing MSNBC Chris Hayes broke the news today that Donald “Trump is objectively pro-Covid”:

Advertisement

Unsurprisingly, a lot of people took issue with Hayes’ proclamation. If it’s “objectively” true, where’s Hayes’ empirical proof? Does Chris Hayes even know what “objectively” means?

And while those are great questions, these questions from Richard Grenell are arguably even more important:

Inquiring minds wanna know.

Chris Hayes is objectively not a trustworthy source for accurate information. Does Twitter care? Does MSNBC?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement