Counterfeit Cop: Dem Jasmine Crockett’s Security Officer Gunned Down by SWAT Team in...
Suicidal Empathy: CNN’s Jake Tapper Acts Out Norm MacDonald’s Viral ‘Muslim Backlash’ Meme...
Treason in Times Square? Crowds Proclaim Loyalty to Islamic Republic, Chant 'Shame, Shame...
Lefty Outlets: Just a Guy Avenging Innocent Family. Reality: Hezbollah Ties All Along
Trump Bombs Kharg Island Military Sites, Spares Oil—Warns Iran to Leave Strait of...
Biden DOJ's Masterstroke: 'Sorry, Not Sorry' Letter for Straw Buyer Who Then Armed...
‘This Is a Case About Swinging D***s:’ A Dissent Goes THERE on Transgender...
Oh Joy: Fake Dr. Jill Biden Drops Memoir LITERALLY No One Asked For
The Cost of Real Community: Showing Up When It's Inconvenient
Cuba's 'Never Bend the Knee' Pledge Meets Reality: Now in Talks with Trump
Congrats to Dearborn: Your Mayor Just Invented the 'Tragic Family Loss' Defense for...
Babylon Bee Breaks the Story About CNN's Much Needed Format Change After an...
Chuck Todd Finds Out the Hard Way That There IS Such a Thing...
Why the Constitution Protected Religion
The Free Press Does the 'Norm': The REAL Problem in America Is the...

Richard Grenell has a couple of objectively good questions after Chris Hayes declares that 'Trump is objectively pro-Covid'

As Twitchy told you, everyone’s favorite tear-stained-sweater-wearing MSNBC Chris Hayes broke the news today that Donald “Trump is objectively pro-Covid”:

Advertisement

Unsurprisingly, a lot of people took issue with Hayes’ proclamation. If it’s “objectively” true, where’s Hayes’ empirical proof? Does Chris Hayes even know what “objectively” means?

And while those are great questions, these questions from Richard Grenell are arguably even more important:

Inquiring minds wanna know.

Chris Hayes is objectively not a trustworthy source for accurate information. Does Twitter care? Does MSNBC?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement