Here We Go! Ohio, North Carolina (and More States) Called for Trump
POLITICO Gives Advice on Not Drowning in X's Election Day Sewer
Based Florida: Gov. Ron DeSantis Says Amendments 3 and 4 Have Failed
CNN's Dana Bash Wonders If Kamala Harris Had Enough Time to Introduce Herself...
Joy Reid Says MSNBC Has Done Everything It Could to Save Us From...
Sen. Cory Booker Has Heard Guys Say Their Girlfriends Will Kill Them If...
Bomb Threats Delay Voting in DeKalb County, Georgia
Keeping An Eye On The Keystone State: Pesky Problems Plague Pennsylvania Polls
‘Based’ Mike Lee Argues That the Supreme Court Should Overturn a Major Precedent...
Dairy State Dispatch: Error Leads Milwaukee Election Officials to Reset, Recount 30k Absen...
Trump Denies Some Corporate Media Credentials to Tonight's (Hopefully!) Victory Party
LIVE: Election Night 2024
CBS News Reminds Voters That Election Disinformation Doesn't End After You Cast Your...
Andrew Mitchell Plays the Misogyny Card HARD When Explaining Kamala's Struggle With Male...
Silent Majority? Quiet Trump Voters are Making a Big Noise at the Ballot...

'It's falling apart': 1619 Project architect Nikole Hannah-Jones' 'small' clarification is actually a pretty big deal

The New York Times’ 1619 Project has come under fire even from liberal-leaning historians for its liberties with history, facts, and the truth. For what it’s worth, project architect Nikole Hannah-Jones recently made a “clarification” to one of the its many dubious claims:

Advertisement

It’s just a “small” clarification, though. No big deal:

That’s putting it mildly, Nikole.

But we’ll get back to that. Here’s the rest of Hannah-Jones’ thread on the subject:

Advertisement

Maybe if you’re going to write “sweeping passages of history,” you should make sure you know what the hell you’re talking about first. Unless, of course, that gets in the way of your narrative.

Anyway, back to the idea of the “small” clarification:

Advertisement

You weren’t clear enough? You know, if the whole project weren’t an exercise in historical revisionism, we might be a little more inclined to take Hannah-Jones’ contrition at face value. But she hasn’t really demonstrated that she deserves the benefit of the doubt.

It’s really not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement