For weeks, Democrats have been shaking their delicate, manicured fists demanding GUN CONTROL because guns are bad, m’kay. Sitting dramatically on the House floor, eating catered food and taking selfies, crying about the lives lost and never once admitting how many lives guns save …
Police: Legally armed bystanders break up Walmart shooting https://t.co/5kVqx4O6PG
— NBC Charlotte (@wcnc) June 27, 2016
This story is not exactly making national headlines because the MSM must protect the Liberal gun agenda. Can’t perpetuate the notion that a good guy with a gun is the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun, now can we?
https://twitter.com/agentmulder5/status/747557630420328448
Yes, we noticed a lack of hashtags on Twitter as well – let us know when #GunsSaveLives starts trending.
@BeladonnaRogers perfect example of why the #2A mustn't be infringed upon by killary and the democrats.
— ?? Jim K ?? (@grey_ghost47) June 27, 2016
Agreed.
The police did acknowledge that legally armed citizens intervened, but also said they would discourage others from doing so in the future and to just “be a good witness.”
Police say don't get involve be "good witnesses." uh, no. These "bystander" good guys deserve a medal. Need more of this, not less.
— ThPope (@thpope) June 27, 2016
Recommended
Better to be "good witnesses" to shootings than to prevent them? Augusta LE has odd priorities. ?
— American ?? Purrl (@AmericanPurrl) June 28, 2016
@DLoesch darned gun nuts, saving lives is ridiculous, they should have waited for the government to save them. Because narrative.
— Larry Waddell (@Xianworldview) June 28, 2016
Gun nuts, caring about life, protecting their neighbors – better take their rights from them because NARRATIVE.
@EnwroughtDreams so yer saying good guys with guns…stopped bad guys with guns?
— ♦️??♦️ (@DaCandyDandy) June 28, 2016
Crazy right?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member