Sex-crimes prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Dr. Christine Blasey Ford last week regarding Brett Kavanaugh allegedly sexually assaulting her in 1982, wrote a lengthy memo in which she said the Ford case is even weaker than a ‘he said, she said’ case.
NEW–> in memo to all Senate Rs obtained by WaPo, Rachel Mitchell argues re Ford case: "A 'he said, she said' case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that." Story TK pic.twitter.com/05VQoFZc4U
— Seung Min Kim (@seungminkim) October 1, 2018
The fifth page for that memo: pic.twitter.com/tgpCz0o9Jz
— Seung Min Kim (@seungminkim) October 1, 2018
Ford did not convince Mitchell, and her memo details why any sane person who is not playing politics would question Ford’s allegations and her story.
From Fox News:
Rachel Mitchell, the sex-crimes prosecutor who questioned Dr. Christine Blasey Ford last week, wrote in a memo released late Sunday that there were inconsistencies in Ford’s testimony and that– given the information at hand– she would not bring criminal charges against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
Mitchell, who was hired by the Senate Judiciary Committee to assist Republicans, addressed the letter to “All Republican Senators,” and said no senator approved the memo. She noted in the assessment that she is a Republican, but said she is not a political person.
Guess how this went over with our rational, thoughtful, and tolerant friends on the Left.
Cue the outrage in 3,2,1 she doesn’t know what she’s talking about . She’s not a real woman because she’s a conservative. She’s a hack , she doesn’t know anything about the case. And on and on and on https://t.co/8E2aW1VB2t
— Diane B ??♀️ (@dmb1031) October 1, 2018
Pretty much.
Look at this noise:
Rachel Mitchell was hired to work for @SenateGOP – noone else. Her duty of loyalty & advocacy is to their goals – which are to confirm Kavanaugh & not permit any investigation. She’s not acting as a prosecutor in the public interest, she’s acting as a private lawyer paid by GOP.
— Empire Storm (@empirestatemind) October 1, 2018
YES, IT’S ALL A PLOT.
*eye roll*
And hey, we can play this game too. Ford is acting as a paid victim by the Left – have you seen the amount of money her GoFundMes have raised?
Mitchell's memo opens with a blatant lie.
— Orange Leader?♂️ (@OrangeLeaderUSA) October 1, 2018
Notice how everyone but Ford is lying.
K.
She is a Republican hack. Does Rachel Mitchell really believe that we are gonna take her word for it that she was paid to arrive at the truth? Her career as Arpaio's and the GOPs toilet would be over.
— NWMouzer (@NWMouzer) October 1, 2018
Screech screech screech.
Kavanaugh is not on trial. There is no innocence until proven guilty for political appointments. His life, liberty or property have never been at stake. These are not criminal proceedings. The onus is on him to prove he is worthy. So far, he is NOT worthy!
— Jose Marin (@JoseMarinLaw) October 1, 2018
Adorable.
As both a former prosecutor and leader of past Senate investigations, let me assure you that her "independent assessment" is neither independent nor a full assessment!
— Derron R. Parks (@derronrparks) October 1, 2018
Oooh, he assured us even.
“Here’s a memo that tells you exactly what you want to hear. Thank you for hiring me, and my dear friend Sheriff Joe sends his regards. I’m not even mad that you fired me. Hugs!”
— Owen Bly (@Pelgridge) October 1, 2018
*sigh*
Regardless of Rachel Mitchell's conclusions, there were numerous questions that remained unanswered in Judge Kavanaugh's testimony. At the root of this entire hearing isn't whether Dr. Ford is telling the truth, but whether Kavanaugh is worthy of sitting on @SCOTUS. 1)
— brian fidler (@brianfidler) October 1, 2018
These folks would be better off just admitting they want Kavanaugh to be guilty no matter what. This has never been about justice, this has been about keeping Kavanaugh off SCOTUS no matter what or who gets hurt.
And this reaction to Mitchell’s memo only further proves that.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member