Being on Twitter, every ONCE in awhile you tweet something that just doesn’t age well. We all do it.
But it’s especially funny when someone like Charles Clymer does it and the tweet includes a ton of virtue signaling, like these tweets on exploiting a tragedy or a terror attack:
.@cmclymer, you've been exposed. Not only a hypocrite, but you are fully aware you're exploiting a tragedy. "I'm disgusted" #FinsburyPark pic.twitter.com/ZJDuyVAy7c
— Democrats for Trump (@YoungDems4Trump) June 19, 2017
Notice one is a tragedy, and one is a terrorist attack.
Also notice he’s bitching at people for calling Manchester a terror attack and in other tweet he’s insisting we need to say these things out loud. Because his narrative tells him this makes sense.
When called out, he tweetstormed, which means it probably bugged him to have to eat his own words:
1/ GASP! Exposed? Whatever will I do. Oh, wait– I could point out your intellectually dishonest bullshit in comparing these tweets. https://t.co/QMzyNWq0u1
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Says the guy spewing intellectually dishonest BS.
2/ The image on the left is calling out the way Trump folks immediately started their Islamophobic bullshit after Manchester.
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
While ignoring his own behavior, yup.
3/ I didn't call it a "terrorist attack" because there's no need. It's a fucking bomb in a stadium. Why state what's obvious to everyone?
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Recommended
It was a terror attack, derp.
4/ The one on the right pertains to how media consistently treats terrorist attacks perpetrated by white people, esp. against folks of color
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Huh? The media called it a terror attack before we even knew what the driver looked like.
Huffington Post syndrome or what?
5/ There's a need to call it "terrorism" because media often refrains from doing in order not to alienate fragile white viewers/readers.
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Lie.
6/ Instead of "terrorism", you get descriptions like "lone wolf", "mentally unsound", "troubled". @DailyMailUK used "clean shaven" last nite
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Psh. He could be talking about Islam.
7/ There's also the bit about what's factual versus what's projected. The Manchester attack was used by Trump folks to blame all of Islam.
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
WHAT?! No.
As he says “Trump folks;” it’s like he doesn’t even understand he is doing the very thing he’s complaining about others doing.
Typical.
8/ Whereas the attack last night was stripped of any bit of commentary that pointed out violent hatred against Muslims.
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Maybe read something other than blogs?
9/ Of course, @YoungDems4Trump, you know this. It's pretty damn obvious. But it's not very convenient for you, is it?
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
Waaaaaaah.
10/ It's must easier to pretend there's a conflict of interest instead of digging down. Liberalism continues to frighten w/ facts. /thread
— Charlotte Clymer?️? (@cmclymer) June 19, 2017
He was so mad he even made a typo.
Gotta love that.
https://twitter.com/TheRoadbeer/status/876862782779543552
/Thread.
Related:
‘REPULSIVE double standard’: J.K. Rowling gets decimated over NASTY Finsbury Park attack tweet
Join the conversation as a VIP Member