You wouldn’t think of Nat Geo as a resource to discuss the bazillion or so genders progressives have pushed down our throats in recent years. Images of majestic lions chasing gazelles and elephants in streams with glorious greenery around them … that is what we expect from Nat Geo.

Not name your gender.


Winner winner, chicken dinner.

This is not difficult. Their name isn’t Nat Gender, it’s Nat Geo and we look to them for geography. Not for unicorns, rainbows, leprechauns and genders.

Seems their followers agree.

With as many pronouns as progressives have listed these days, we don’t see why not?