Guess people would rather not have their donations go to pay for Chelsea’s wedding …
Or maybe they figured out the “pay-to-play” thing is basically game over.
Either way, donations to the Clinton Foundation are WAY down.
.@ClintonFdn donations have dropped 37%. pic.twitter.com/Twp0H028Qc
— Fox News (@FoxNews) November 21, 2016
Whoa. 37%. Way to go, Hillary.
Influence-peddling operation runs out of inventoryhttps://t.co/DVKONSYaJa
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) November 21, 2016
When it comes out that your foundation only donates a teensy tiny portion to actually help people, collecting money can become rather challenging.
Transparency is a fickle bitch.
@iowahawkblog I'm looking forward to the launch The Clinton Foundation's "Keep Hill and Bill on Chappaqua" GoFundMe page.
— Sam Valley (@SamValley) November 21, 2016
PLEASE do not give the Clinton’s any ideas, although we would not put it past them to create their own GoFundMe page.
@FoxNews @ClintonFdn Expect the drop to continue. They don't have the influence their donors neededexpected
— just alan (@anythingbutdem) November 21, 2016
Yup. Why pay for play when the group you’re paying for said play doesn’t really have the influence and power you thought they would? Oh wait, charity and stuff … yeah, ain’t nobody got time for that.
@FoxNews @ClintonFdn Shes not going to be pres and then donations dropped?! What a coincidence! Donations dropped when she lost influence
— Jay Brody (@theJaybrody) November 21, 2016
Donations also dropped when people realized the corruption within the Clinton Foundation. Just a guess.
@FoxNews @ClintonFdn Not enough. More work needed.
— Sheri (@TexasSheri) November 21, 2016
Give it time.
@FoxNews @ClintonFdn just wait. They'll be down 70%. No more pay to play.
— VK Rural FlyOver (@vjeannek) November 21, 2016
WHOOPS! Biden meant to say ‘I applaud Canada’ but instead named a different country
To change your comments display name, click here.