Full disclosure: this editor typically ignores Andrew Tate mainly because he's pretty much just a troll account looking for engagement by being as horrible and/or mean as possible. Hey, to each their own, social media can be an ugly place, but the schtick is a little tedious.
Boring, even.
Sort of like Eric Swalwell. Sure, there's big news about him and mortgage fraud and accusations about his even being a co-conspirator to remove Trump, BUT every time we write about him, people sort of yawn.
So, unless Swalwell farts on national television again (or gets arrested), we probably won't cover him as much. And that's how we see Tate.
Unless he says something worthwhile or interesting, we likely won't cover him. Now, if someone like Mary Katharine Ham zings him on one of his more putrid and uninteresting posts, well then, you know we have to cover it.
Case in point.
Zero women, huh? pic.twitter.com/xSBNmGsNbd
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) November 17, 2025
Ahem.
*cough cough even*
It's pretty perfect, right? We can see what she did here. We only hope Tate gets it, too.
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) November 17, 2025
HA HA HA HA HA HA
— Amy Curtis (@RantyAmyCurtis) November 17, 2025
Congrats to the women.
— Casey Mattox (@CaseyMattox_) November 17, 2025
Women seriously dodged a bullet this time.
Oh boy
— Magills (@magills_) November 17, 2025
Recommended
— Wonko the Sane (@Amuk31) November 17, 2025
We didn't say it. We laughed. We included the posts. But in the end, we did not say it.
Not exactly.
============================================================
Related:
Well, Well, WELL! We're FINALLY Learning More About Trump Assassin Wannabe Thomas Crooks and HOOBOY
============================================================