We don't expect much from the mainstream media in general, especially when it comes to The New York Times, but their Charlie Kirk obituary is a whole new low we honestly didn't think was possible. Then again, this is the same rag that wrote nice things about Hitler (it's true, look it up), so maybe we shouldn't be all that surprised.
Check this out:
Shameful from the NYT obit of Charlie Kirk pic.twitter.com/1UmkbVfA9a
— Julia Steinberg (@julialsteinberg) September 10, 2025
Awful.
It doesn't get any better.
From The New York Times:
Charlie Kirk, a conservative wunderkind who, through his radio show, books, political organizing, and speaking tours, did much to shape the hard-right movement that has coalesced around President Trump, becoming a close ally of his, died on Wednesday in Orem, Utah, after he had been shot while speaking at a college campus event. He was 31.
President Trump confirmed the death on his social media site, Truth Social.
Hard-right. Think about that for a minute. People who disagree with the crazy left are apparently the 'hard right' now. And he wrote this in the freaking obituary.
This is real?!
— Kulak Privilege (@Gossarian) September 10, 2025
We had a similar reaction when we first saw it, and yes, it's real.
The @nytimes is utter trash. Their progapanda stoked this violence. More blood is on their hands
— Snuggs! (@SnuggyJr) September 10, 2025
They treat mass murderers with more dignity. pic.twitter.com/CZI6LrJyx0
— Kathryn Paisner (@KathrynPaisner) September 10, 2025
Of course, they do.
The whole obit is shameful, these are the last three grafs pic.twitter.com/WGIKry7Qeq
— Andrew Day (@AKDay89) September 10, 2025
Far right.
Hard right.
Passive-aggressive digs about white supremacy.
There are just no words for how awful legacy media really is. This editor is speechless.
============================================================
Related:
UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Has Passed Away at the Age of 31 After Being Shot at College Event
============================================================