Unassigned

New York Times Says the TREASONOUS Part Out Loud, Tries Backpedaling but It's WAAAY Too Late for That

At this point in our Twitchy lives, you'd think nothing would bother or shock us, and yet The New York Times found a way to do just that. Hey, we get it, they hate Trump, they're not big fans of America in general, and the idea of 45-47 doing something to help Americans struggling is somehow triggering to these people, but still. Whining because the military hasn't overthrown our duly elected president.

Advertisement

Really, you guys?

That's low and stupid, even for you.

Yes, they are.

Wow.

Exactly. They don't have a problem with authoritarianism as long as they're the ones in charge.

Oh, they tried to change the headline, but we all saw it.

We all saw the actual story as well ... 

Did we say wow already? Yeah? Well, wow again.

This is despicable.

Advertisement

As long as they're the ones doing it.

You bet.

============================================================

Related:

HA! Pour One OUT! Scott Jennings Just ENDED Every Single Anchor and Pundit Claiming DC Crime Is Down 30%

Schifftier Than We THOUGHT! New Declassified Docs Expose the REAL Reason Why Adam Schiff Went After Trump

WOOF! Alexander Vindman's Illiterate 'Fascist Trump' Post Goes VIRAL for All the Wrong HILARIOUS Reasons

THIS Is How It's DONE! Here's the Arrest List From 1 NIGHT With Trump's National Guard Protecting D.C.

BOOM! Winsome Earle-Sears Just Dropped Another Ad That Abigail Spanberger Will HAVE to Answer For (Watch)

============================================================