You won't believe what self-involved media is calling Jill Abramson story (Or maybe you will) [pic]

Oh, that’s happening.

Jillghazi? pic.twitter.com/cZ644KB6sn

— Jim Roberts (@nycjim) May 19, 2014

Jillghazi. Unbelievable, yet completely believable coming from the Ivory Tower-dwelling, self-involved media.

As Twitchy reported, Jill Abramson is out as executive editor from the New York Times and it was also discovered that her pay was “considerably less” than that of her male predecessor. To the media, the story is on par with the tragedy in Benghazi.

Citizens are rightly none too pleased with the “Jillghazi” term.

[oh FFS] RT @nycjim: Jillghazi? pic.twitter.com/Oiz54IU7rm

— Jeff Sonstein ? (@jeffsonstein) May 19, 2014

@nycjim oh goodness no.

— Ellen Wernecke (@neithernor) May 19, 2014

https://twitter.com/conservbtfly/status/468355227435794433

<headdesk> "@nycjim: Jillghazi? pic.twitter.com/PZQqhW7sKi”

— Tina W (@tmwinsett) May 19, 2014

Some perspective for the obtuse media:

@nycjim the paper could use a lesson in proportionality

— Jean h Tuttle (@tuttle_h) May 19, 2014

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/468353543179489281

https://twitter.com/dbartolec/status/468356686273449985

Related:

Twitchy coverage of Jill Abramson