'Blood is on YOUR Hands': Muslim Woman Takes Rashida Tlaib APART for Her...
'長大!' Eric Swalwell Insists He Knows Who the House will Expel Next and...
Cori Bush Compares Herself to Rosa Parks Pushing for 'Liberation' and Even Her...
Politifact Gets Politi-DRAGGED for Claiming Obvious Palestinian Crisis Actor ISN'T a Crisi...
Liz Cheney is a Jerk. That's it. That's the Headline
Unhinged lefties MELTING DOWN Over Biden and the '24 Election on Viral 'Abandon...
Marina Medvin Brings Receipts Regarding Gaza Civilians Cheering Hamas Rockets (video)
Guys, NEVER Go Full Kamala: WATCH Kamala Harris Push to 'Revitalize Palestinian Authority'...
Only Way to be SURE --> Community Notes NUKING Biden From Orbit for...
New Survey Shows TikTok, Not X, Is Where to Find Antisemitic Content
More Than 1,300 Actors Sign Letter Condemning Firing of 'Scream' Star
Politico: Gov. Gavin Newsom's Camp Says Sean Hannity, Ron DeSantis Cheated in Debate
Man Reportedly Yells 'Allahu Akbar' Before Deadly Stabbing in Paris
NBC News' Ben Collins Informs Us 'There's No Take-Backs on Fascism'
Residents of Gaza Turn Out in Force for Hostage Exchanges

Reality is hard: Obama's favorite economic reporter Paul Krugman uses 'It's a Wonderful Life' bank to slam Romney

And the ever-wrong and unemployable David Shuster joins in.

https://twitter.com/#!/MHB2012/status/204954032782053378

https://twitter.com/#!/DavidShuster/status/204687171616112640

Advertisement

Oh, dear. As Twitchy reported last month, President Obama calls Paul Krugman “one of the smartest economic reporters out there.” Good grief!

While accusing Mitt Romney of not understanding banking, he uses a fantasy from a movie as an example of how one should understand banking. No, really.

Here’s what the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said about JPMorgan’s $2 billion loss (which may actually have been $3 billion, or $5 billion, or more, but who’s counting?): “This was a loss to shareholders and owners of JPMorgan and that’s the way America works. Some people experienced a loss in this case because of a bad decision. By the way, there was someone who made a gain.”

What’s wrong with this statement? Well, suppose that someone — say, Jimmy Stewart in the movie “It’s a Wonderful Life” — runs a bank that takes in deposits and invests the money in various ways. And suppose that one of those investments is a risky bet on some complex financial instrument, with Mr. Potter, the evil plutocrat, on the other side.

If Jimmy Stewart’s bet pays off, we’re in Romneyworld: he’s made money, Mr. Potter has lost money, and that’s that. But suppose Jimmy Stewart loses his bet. If the bet was big enough, he no longer has enough assets to pay off his depositors. His bank collapses, probably in a chaotic bank run that takes down the whole town’s economy as collateral damage. Mr. Potter makes money on the deal, but so what?

Advertisement

For Paul Krugman, not only is math hard but reality is hard. Twitter users were quick to correct the “smartest economic reporter out there.”

https://twitter.com/#!/LMBigSur/status/204801762987749377

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204951314671742976

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204951495362355200

https://twitter.com/#!/MediaTopCop/status/204687628895928320

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204953384137138176

That will be giggle-snort worthy!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement