What First Amendment? Gavin Newsom Gets His Butt Handed to Him Over CA...
Here's 'Disqualifying' Video of Kamala Harris Explaining How Gov't Could Deal With Legal...
Now It Looks Like More Than Just Pagers Are Exploding in Hezbollah Hands...
Bassem Youssef Is Ratioed Into Oblivion Following His Take on Israel's Pager Attack...
Hillary Clinton Wants to Know What YOU Think About Her FOURTH Memoir (Obviously...
New Poll Indicates Dems' Efforts to Make Kamala Harris More Likeable Are Backfiring...
Tom Elliott Explains 'How the Fake News Sausage Is Made' in 5 Maddening...
Trans Women Are Bullies: J.K. Rowling DROPS Man Forcing a Woman to Say...
Well LOOKY HERE: Kamala Harris Once Praised Now-Arrested Diddy for Hosting Town Hall...
Want Some Cheese With That Whine? Don Lemon Uses Lies to Blame Trump...
Finally, a Media Member Shows a Modicum of Sanity After Second Attempt on...
Could Joe Walsh Sink Any Lower?
Lies and the Lying Infanticidal Liars Who Tell Them
New Study Nukes Study Saying Black Newborns Are More Likely to Die With...
Twitter Has Thoughts About Video of 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda Door Knocking for Kamala...

Reality is hard: Obama's favorite economic reporter Paul Krugman uses 'It's a Wonderful Life' bank to slam Romney

And the ever-wrong and unemployable David Shuster joins in.

https://twitter.com/#!/MHB2012/status/204954032782053378

https://twitter.com/#!/DavidShuster/status/204687171616112640

Advertisement

Oh, dear. As Twitchy reported last month, President Obama calls Paul Krugman “one of the smartest economic reporters out there.” Good grief!

While accusing Mitt Romney of not understanding banking, he uses a fantasy from a movie as an example of how one should understand banking. No, really.

Here’s what the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said about JPMorgan’s $2 billion loss (which may actually have been $3 billion, or $5 billion, or more, but who’s counting?): “This was a loss to shareholders and owners of JPMorgan and that’s the way America works. Some people experienced a loss in this case because of a bad decision. By the way, there was someone who made a gain.”

What’s wrong with this statement? Well, suppose that someone — say, Jimmy Stewart in the movie “It’s a Wonderful Life” — runs a bank that takes in deposits and invests the money in various ways. And suppose that one of those investments is a risky bet on some complex financial instrument, with Mr. Potter, the evil plutocrat, on the other side.

If Jimmy Stewart’s bet pays off, we’re in Romneyworld: he’s made money, Mr. Potter has lost money, and that’s that. But suppose Jimmy Stewart loses his bet. If the bet was big enough, he no longer has enough assets to pay off his depositors. His bank collapses, probably in a chaotic bank run that takes down the whole town’s economy as collateral damage. Mr. Potter makes money on the deal, but so what?

Advertisement

For Paul Krugman, not only is math hard but reality is hard. Twitter users were quick to correct the “smartest economic reporter out there.”

https://twitter.com/#!/LMBigSur/status/204801762987749377

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204951314671742976

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204951495362355200

https://twitter.com/#!/MediaTopCop/status/204687628895928320

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204953384137138176

That will be giggle-snort worthy!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos