Well, the media ran with the flap over Donald Trump’s comments about the Khans all weekend. It continues today. You can agree or disagree with that, but what else does this story show? Once again, it highlights media bias and hypocrisy. First, take a look at this tweet from a New York Times reporter and CNN “analyst.”
Trump team releases transcript of ABC interview, thinking calling Mr. Khan "nice" somehow obviated the second part of what he said.
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) July 31, 2016
Just the facts? HA!
This is a NYTimes reporter, not a Hillary operative, remember. https://t.co/MZsgTS1bsQ
— JohnGilmore (@Shabbosgoy) July 31, 2016
Indeed. Once again, a water carrier for Hillary Clinton.
@maggieNYT Should I be able to tell whom you are voting for?
— John (@funnicegoodkind) July 31, 2016
Zing! Not hard to tell is it? But we already knew that, didn’t we?
Sharyl Attkisson has some exit advice for all opinion-thrusting, biased journos:
It's fine to think it but in a news piece your personal opinions shouldn't enter, so I was once taught.
— Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) July 31, 2016
Yeah, what the heck happened to that?