The Supreme Court Rules on Deportations to Third-Party Countries (LAWSPLAINING)
UK Home Secretary Reopening Resettlement Schemes for Palestinians Who Have Fled the Horror...
Sen. Mark Warner Says 100,000 Virginians Have Been Kicked Off of SNAP Because...
Sunny Hostin Defended the Cornell 7 — and, Painfully, She’s Right
Rev. Suggests Lazarus Was Gay Because Jesus Called for Him to ‘Come Out’
Rep. LaMonica McIver Is Facing Prison for Touching ICE Officers — She Just...
Mamdani the Pied-À-Terrible: NYC Mayor Loses in Court on Tax-The-Rich Rollout
The Bulwark’s Focus Group Says Abdul El-Sayed Is Over-Performing With Trump Voters
Kyle Kulinski Has No Doubt Mossad Has Videos of Trump 'Doing Ungodly Things...
Cory Booker Thinks a Criminal Who Undermined One Election Is Very Likely to...
Tight Race, Tight Pants: James Talarico Victory Could Obliterate State Religion of Texas...
Venezuelan Shot by ICE Charged by DOJ With Assaulting a Federal Officer
El-Sayed Wants Money Out of Politics — Except the Soros Family That Hand-Selected...
Jack Smith Subpoenaed Checks From Thousands of Americans Who Donated As Little As...
The Cornell 7: Viral Outrage, Changing Statements, and Why Prosecutors May Have Walked...

Kentucky Passes Bill to Hold Fathers Responsible for Pregnancy Costs and the Left is MAD

AP Photo/Teresa Crawford

A new bill recently passed with bipartisan support in the Kentucky senate that would grant the right to collect retroactive child support for unborn children. The bill allows a parent to seek child support up to a year after birth for the expenses of the pregnancy itself. Senator Whitney Westerfield testified that pregnancy carries a duty of responsibility for BOTH the male and female involved in the pregnancy and any expenses incurred during the nine months of pregnancy is the duty of the other parent to help with.

Advertisement

According to The AP, Westerfield stated 'I believe that life begins at conception, but even if you don’t, there’s no question that there are obligations and costs involved with having a child before that child is born.'

He is, of course, completely right. But what most don't know? This was already the law in Kentucky, only the time frame was adjusted.

Maybe instead of wasting taxpayer money on presenting bills that mimic laws currently on the books we could, we don't know, ENFORCE those existing laws? Just a suggestion.

That said, this has greatly angered the AWFULs (Affluent White Female Urban Leftists). Why, we can't say. They screech about holding men accountable for pregnancy, too, but when we do, it's somehow also bad? There is no making any heads or tails out of what the AWFULs are constantly yelling about. You're just as terrible if you do what they demand as you are if you don't.

Advertisement

Case in point. This sounds alarmingly like a threat. And for what? Making the father help cover the costs the mother incurs during her pregnancy? Isn't that a GOOD thing??

We're still not sure why they're conflicted about this. They have literally been screeching about holding men accountable for pregnancy for years, and when we do that, they're not sure how to feel about it? We guarantee if a Democrat had put forth this bill, they wouldn't be so confused in their feelings.

They're so mad LOL

First, no Republican is trying to outlaw contraceptives. Second, if a guy has fathered ten children, why is it a bad thing to have him pay child support for those children?

Advertisement

Not everyone is as unreasonably upset about this as leftists are, though.

They really are, and it's so funny! 'I don't know how I feel about this bill...'

Yes you do, you just can't say you're happy about it because it was a Republican-sponsored bill and you can't bring yourself to say you agree with ANYTHING connected to a Republican.

When Westerfield presented his bill to the Senate committee, he said 'So if there’s not a child support order until the child’s 8 [years old], this isn’t going to apply. Even at a year and a day, this doesn’t apply. It’s only for orders that are in place within a year of the child’s birth.'

Advertisement

Weren't abortion advocates demanding mandatory vasectomies up until now? Also, no, vasectomies are intended to be permanent, and 'reversal' doesn't guarantee fertility.

As was stated earlier, this type of law already exists in Kentucky, along with most all other states.

If you're curious about the prenatal child support laws in your state, Daniel Gump has done extensive research and you can find it right there.

Lefties? You're welcome. We are taking your suggestions and enacting legislation to hold men accountable for pregnancy and the children they help create!

Advertisement

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your VIP membership!



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement