Earlier today, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that initial claims for state unemployment benefits unexpectedly dropped 30,000 to 339,000 from 369,000 a week ago.

Economists were forecasting a reading of 370,000, according to Bloomberg.

The plunge in initial jobless claims is seen in some quarters as confirmation of last Friday’s unemployment report that the U.S. economy is improving.

Twitter users immediately began attacking former General Electric CEO Jack Welch, who suggested that last week’s unemployment report was manipulated to make the Obama administration look good ahead of next month’s election:

But Bloomberg reported something odd that raised doubts about today’s jobless claims report.

One state accounted for most of the plunge in claims, a Labor Department spokesman said as the data were issued to the press.

Forbes added fuel to the fire with this:

[I]t seems this week’s data was skewed by a large state failing to report quarterly figures. “Some are saying it was California, though we cannot confirm that,” says FTN Financial economist Chris Low. “As a result, the reported plunge in claims is suspect. We expect claims will continue trending lower through the quarter, as there is strong seasonal bias downward anyway…But the big drop this week will likely be revised or be followed by a pop upward next week.”

Marketwatch quotes another analyst who thinks the missing state is California:

Added Stephen Stanley of Pierpont Securities: “The formula for the size of a claimant’s benefit check is derived based on an average of their last few quarters of pay (the more you were earning before being laid off, the bigger your unemployment check would be). Thus, in many cases, it pays for a laid-off worker to game the formula by waiting until the beginning of the next calendar quarter to file (if they can wait that long), as they may have been getting paid more in the quarter when they were laid off than in the quarter that rolls out of the equation if they wait.”

“As a result, there is an accumulation of claims that are likely submitted over a period of several weeks but not processed until the turn of the quarter. Apparently, the state in question (and it pretty much has to be California to account for anything close to 30,000) forgot to include that stockpile of unprocessed claims in their tally for this week (which is the first week of a new calendar quarter). Since the seasonal factors expected an unadjusted surge of almost 20% in the period to account for the quarterly filing pattern, failure to adhere to that pattern in the raw data (unadjusted claims were only up 8.6%) creates a big drop seasonally adjusted.”

CNBC’s Kelly Evans is reporting in a confusing series of tweets that “one state did not process & report its typical seasonal workload” and that it’s likely we’ll see headline jobless claim numbers rebound next week.

Evans’ colleague Becky Quick sums up Evans’ reporting as follows:

We’re not sure Evans said what Quick thinks she said.

If you’re feeling confused, join the club.

If anyone can cut through all the spin and confusion, it’s bond traders. This morning the bond market is reacting to the jobless claims numbers with a yawn, which means the prospect for employment growth in the U.S. remains bleak.