Oops!
https://twitter.com/markpytlik/status/339869773024350208
Will “Get Lucky” rule the summer? And more importantly, will Daft Punk see competition from Daft Pink and Daft Puck? The New York Times is (accidentally) on it!
Check out the correction for this story on Daft Pink, I mean Daft Puck, oh, whatever: http://t.co/6KM3MnGdQk
— Lawrence Hurley (@lawrencehurley) May 30, 2013
The full correction:
Because of editing errors, an earlier version of this article misstated the group’s name twice. As the article correctly noted elsewhere, it is Daft Punk, not Daft Puck or Daft Pink.
One of the best @nytimes corrections. Ever. http://t.co/2G1hSAH1pe] h/t @dcjpad pic.twitter.com/I8rRwvXaw6
— Jim Roberts (@nycjim) May 30, 2013
Hey, we all make typos. Some are just more snicker-worthy than others.
Have you guys heard the new Daft Pink album?
— Ethan Klapper (@ethanklapper) May 30, 2013
https://twitter.com/ayjay/status/340108324144033792
@ryanbeckwith Daft Pink would be a great name for an all-female Daft Punk cover band. Daft Puck, I guess, an all-Canadian one.
— bart (@bart_smith) May 30, 2013
Recommended
Deft! RT @kenneyoncary: NYT: As the article correctly noted elsewhere, it is Daft Punk, not Daft Puck or Daft Pink. http://t.co/hi59i1Z7YY
— Frank Strong ??✒️? (@Frank_Strong) May 30, 2013
Daft Puck is my favorite Shakespearean insult. https://t.co/Q3OGf4vvUu
— Danielle Ivory (@danielle_ivory) May 30, 2013
Laughs 4 days RT @oxfordist "As the article correctly noted elsewhere, it is Daft Punk, not Daft Puck or Daft Pink." http://t.co/a7FkEyWjwE
— Abbie Stutzer (@AbbieStutzer) May 30, 2013
Heh:
Is Daft Pink trending yet?
— andrew dallos (@adallos) May 30, 2013
Join the conversation as a VIP Member