Food Network Chef Anne Burrell Dead at 55
Steer & Escort: NYT Crafts Dem-Friendly Phrases to Downplay Brad Lander’s Obstruction of...
Chuck Schumer Blames Trump for Political Violence in Minnesota, Forgets His Own SCOTUS...
DNC Chair Drops an F-Bomb on Trump, Tells Him Not to Waste Gov....
Sen. Tammy Duckworth Lists Better Uses of Money Than a Parade for a...
Soy-Infused Protesters Take Swings at a MAGA Hat Piñata and Donald Trump Doll
Insane Liberal White Woman Drops to Her Knees and Screams After Being Pried...
This Old Instagram Post From Zohran Mamdani About 'Socialist Feminism' Says It All
The Atlantic Reports That the Democrats Have a 'Man Problem'
'Stai Zitto, Perdente!' Giorgia Meloni Wins Eye Roll of the Century While Talking...
Border Patrol Admits ZERO Illegal Immigrants in May, Compared to 62,000 a Year...
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem Rushed to DC Hospital
This Democrat Senator Started Sobbing on the Senate Floor. It's a Publicity Stunt.
Urine Trouble, NYT! Elon Musk Says Drug Test Proves the Outlet’s 'Sources Say'...
Will the US Be Taking in Refugees From the Middle East? The Consensus...

Sen. Johnson on GOP Leaders: 'Right Now, It Doesn't Appear That They Are Willing to Fix It'

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) tweets, "Republican leaders repeatedly say, "We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem." Right now, it doesn't appear that they are willing to fix it. I am going to insist that we do."

Advertisement

We have a spending problem. Spending alone does not amount to the entirety of the problem; it is a symptom. Our spending problem results from a priorities problem. Too much government spending results from undisciplined budgetary policies. Imprudent fiscal policies result from an ideological frame of approach that prioritizes spending the maximum allowable amount of federal government dollars, plus some more. It is a policy orientation toward government maximizing itself to (or even beyond) the limit, rather than being disciplined and intentional about what it does do.

The point being made by Sen. Johnson should be heard by other Republicans in Congress as a blaring warning siren that one key reason they are in the positions they currently occupy is to stop wasteful and reckless federal government spending. There is a limit to the amount of national spending that can be sustained.

The solution is for those elected under the pretext of stopping oversized spending to do what they are elected to do. When the Republican Party, the political party of the two that claims to forward principles of fiscal responsibility, wins an election, such as the 2024 elections yielded for the GOP, those elected Republicans are empowered to serve as a check on the reckless spending that Democrats would otherwise do. When those elected to stop reckless spending fail to do so, there is a threefold result. First, it devalues the electoral choice of voters who elected Republicans to provide fiscal responsibility. Second, it diminishes the Republican Party, which purports to stand for fiscal responsibility. Third, and perhaps most practically, it allows the reckless spending to continue, furthering an already perilous spending and economic situation.

Advertisement

If Republicans campaign as fiscal hawks who are sincerely tired of the immoral spending practices that the U.S. federal government has engaged in for too long, they must also govern unwaveringly toward that end.

Update:

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) tweets, "Ron Johnson reminds us why we have a $37 trillion debt."

Editor's Note:

A tweet by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and its context have been added to the bottom of this post.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement