Soft Bigotry Speedrun: White Liberal Women Say Black Voters Can't Use the Internet...
Hillary Clinton's SMUG Authoritarian Trump Dig BACKFIRES via Community Notes in the Most...
‘Circle Back’ Psaki Preaches the Value of Media Asking Tough Questions to ‘Hold...
Actor Wallace Shawn: You Can't Be More Evil Than What the Israelis Are...
BBC: Bare Nails Trend Perpetuates White Supremacist Standards of Beauty
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the Socialist Prime Minister of Spain Play With...
Americans Are Not McLovin’ It: Russia Hits McDonald’s Warehouse Near Kyiv — Twice
Britain Naturalized a Hamas Bodyguard, and He Planned a Mass Attack on Jews...
Ms. Rachel Blasts ‘Christian Hypocrisy’ While Ignoring Who Actually Gives More to Charity
Sunny Hostin Explains That As a Black Woman in the US, Her 'Average'...
PhD’s Heart Breaks for Marine One Pilot Being Yelled at by Trump
The Rent-A-Mob Clocked in Again: Palestinian Flags Appear at Google’s Anti-AI Protest
Report: Black Woman's 'Lynching' Was Staged After She Was Killed During Drug Dispute
CNN's Jake Tapper Reports That Trump's 'Outside Advisors' Are Telling Him to Declare...
Female App State Student Arrested for Threatening to Massacre Viewers of ‘We Will...

Sen. Johnson on GOP Leaders: 'Right Now, It Doesn't Appear That They Are Willing to Fix It'

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) tweets, "Republican leaders repeatedly say, "We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem." Right now, it doesn't appear that they are willing to fix it. I am going to insist that we do."

Advertisement

We have a spending problem. Spending alone does not amount to the entirety of the problem; it is a symptom. Our spending problem results from a priorities problem. Too much government spending results from undisciplined budgetary policies. Imprudent fiscal policies result from an ideological frame of approach that prioritizes spending the maximum allowable amount of federal government dollars, plus some more. It is a policy orientation toward government maximizing itself to (or even beyond) the limit, rather than being disciplined and intentional about what it does do.

The point being made by Sen. Johnson should be heard by other Republicans in Congress as a blaring warning siren that one key reason they are in the positions they currently occupy is to stop wasteful and reckless federal government spending. There is a limit to the amount of national spending that can be sustained.

The solution is for those elected under the pretext of stopping oversized spending to do what they are elected to do. When the Republican Party, the political party of the two that claims to forward principles of fiscal responsibility, wins an election, such as the 2024 elections yielded for the GOP, those elected Republicans are empowered to serve as a check on the reckless spending that Democrats would otherwise do. When those elected to stop reckless spending fail to do so, there is a threefold result. First, it devalues the electoral choice of voters who elected Republicans to provide fiscal responsibility. Second, it diminishes the Republican Party, which purports to stand for fiscal responsibility. Third, and perhaps most practically, it allows the reckless spending to continue, furthering an already perilous spending and economic situation.

Advertisement

If Republicans campaign as fiscal hawks who are sincerely tired of the immoral spending practices that the U.S. federal government has engaged in for too long, they must also govern unwaveringly toward that end.

Update:

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) tweets, "Ron Johnson reminds us why we have a $37 trillion debt."

Editor's Note:

A tweet by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and its context have been added to the bottom of this post.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement