Fascist’s Fury: Dem Chris Murphy Vows to Use Government Might Against Companies Dems...
From Human Traffickers to Terrorists: The Convict Parents of the Left’s Loudest ‘Anti-Rich...
Homophobia Is Bad … Except When It’s Against Conservatives: Kimmel’s Cringe WHCD Stand-In...
Is This Photo Purporting to Show Trump Fast Asleep in the WH Real...
Falklands Fallout: US Tells Britain to 'Falk Off' After Iran Snub – Piers...
Rep. Brandon Gill Blows Up Spectrum’s Scooter Love Story: Rep. Min’s Real Reason...
We Are So Back: DOJ Revives Firing Squad as 'Most Dignified' Execution Method
Hasan Piker: Trust-Fund Trotsky Who Encourages Felonies While Melting Down Over His My...
Cory Booker Is Worried Trump Will Seize Media Control Now That Democrats Are...
The Blind Spot: Blue Collar Workers Fund Comfortable Bureaucrats, Then Get Lectures on...
Chris Cuomo: DOJ Is ‘Helping the Bad Guys’ by Targeting the SPLC for...
FINALLY! WaPo Announces Bernie Sanders' New Initiative to Reach Leftists on College Campus...
This Damning Segment on the SPLC Is Just 1 Reason Dems Are Melting...
NASA’s Missing Scientists Mystery Is Getting Way Too Real
John Harwood Gets Introduced to Himself After Questioning the Objectivity of a CBS...

Sen. Josh Hawley Reposts Washington Post Headline: 'Meta Went to Extreme Lengths'

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez, File

"Should be a surprise to absolutely no one," tweets Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), reposting a Washington Post tweet.

Advertisement

The Washington Post tweet reads, "Exclusive: Meta went to extreme lengths, including developing a censorship system, in a failed attempt to bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China, according to a whistleblower complaint."

The phrase "developing a censorship system" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the protection of free speech. The phrase "extreme lengths" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the corruption and disproportionate power of "Big Tech" entities.

Things are not a big deal until they are a big deal. Yes, the 21st Century comes with some technical challenges not before encountered, and those are sometimes delicate to deal with. Such challenges that require balancing include protecting "Big Tech"/media corporations' right to do business, while also protecting speech and privacy concerns of users. A fundamental approach is helpful because it can trim down some of the extra, distilling the heart of the issue. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. Media advancements can be enjoyed without media companies, platforms that facilitate certain media services, being allowed to run roughshod over people.

Advertisement

Power and the abuse of it is what this boils down to. The lack of concern and seeming contempt that some of the big media companies display toward the people who use their services, who benefit their bottom line, is astounding. The seeming contempt that such companies display toward the United States of America, which allows them the freedom to innovate and create the media empires they boast, is equally as astounding. Regulations will always come up short because regulations cannot cover everything. At some point, there must be a willingness among those who hold power in the marketplace to do what is right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement