Bulwark’s Tim Miller Applauds Jamie Raskin’s Investigation Into Trump's 60 Minutes Intervi...
'Major Milestone’: Home in Pacific Palisades Receives Final Approval From the City
When Jake Tapper Said the J6 Pipe Bomber Was a ‘White Man’ and...
Rep. Jerry Nadler Explains Why States Are Refusing to Hand Over SNAP Data:...
Pramila Jayapal: ‘Being Undocumented Isn’t a Crime’ – Federal Law and Half of...
Jim Acosta Says Trump Should Be Impeached Over Hateful Comments About the Somali...
Another ‘Police Brutality’ Story Collapses: Woman Refuses ID to Protect Illegal Boyfriend
JD Vance Is Hearing Rumors That the EU Commission Will Fine X Hundreds...
George Clooney's Casual Muslim Brotherhood Flex: Bragging About Wife's Terror Ties on Barr...
Mayor Brandon Johnson Refuses to Entertain Racist Question About Teen Violence in Chicago
Rep. Ilhan Omar Claims She Knew Nothing About $250 Million Welfare Fraud Scheme
Dumbo Gumbo: Leftist Pro-Illegal Alien Protesters Disrupt Council Meeting Over New Orleans...
Mollie Hemingway Nails It — FBI Sat on Jan 5 Pipe Bomb Intel...
Local News Reports on the Rich History of Somali Integration in Minnesota
Walz Complains People Are Driving By and Yelling the ‘R’ Word—X Replies With...

Sen. Josh Hawley Reposts Washington Post Headline: 'Meta Went to Extreme Lengths'

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez, File

"Should be a surprise to absolutely no one," tweets Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), reposting a Washington Post tweet.

Advertisement

The Washington Post tweet reads, "Exclusive: Meta went to extreme lengths, including developing a censorship system, in a failed attempt to bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China, according to a whistleblower complaint."

The phrase "developing a censorship system" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the protection of free speech. The phrase "extreme lengths" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the corruption and disproportionate power of "Big Tech" entities.

Things are not a big deal until they are a big deal. Yes, the 21st Century comes with some technical challenges not before encountered, and those are sometimes delicate to deal with. Such challenges that require balancing include protecting "Big Tech"/media corporations' right to do business, while also protecting speech and privacy concerns of users. A fundamental approach is helpful because it can trim down some of the extra, distilling the heart of the issue. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. Media advancements can be enjoyed without media companies, platforms that facilitate certain media services, being allowed to run roughshod over people.

Advertisement

Power and the abuse of it is what this boils down to. The lack of concern and seeming contempt that some of the big media companies display toward the people who use their services, who benefit their bottom line, is astounding. The seeming contempt that such companies display toward the United States of America, which allows them the freedom to innovate and create the media empires they boast, is equally as astounding. Regulations will always come up short because regulations cannot cover everything. At some point, there must be a willingness among those who hold power in the marketplace to do what is right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement