Socialists and the City: Cynthia Nixon Scores a Sweet NY Gig After Staying...
Hijab-Wearing DSA Queen Linda Sarsour: 'Screw 1776, Let's Build a Document That Matches...
Maine Dem Freezes at Last Night's Debate, Blames ICE Shooting, Then Begs for...
Put American Students First: The Viral Indian Harvard Plea That Exposed Everything
Raccoon Swoon: Seattle Residents Hope to Catch a Glimpse of Cute Masked Bandit...
Carry On, Patriots! Navy Secretary Hung Cao Puts an END to Lefties Screeching...
Trump Exposes China, Democrats for 2020 Election Inteference
Jennifer Newsom Stumbles and Stammers When Confronted With the Fact the DOJ Probe...
Hillary Clinton Just Broke Her Projection Record While Ranting About Trump 'Undermining Ou...
Tim Walz's 'Friendly Reminder' About Donald Trump Is Blowing Up in His Face...
Dem Michigan Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Exposes His Own Wife as a Bigot...
CNN National Security Hack Gets Called Out for Bogus Claim About Election Interference...
Hot Take of the Week: Bring Back EV and Solar Tax Credits to...
Mamdani's Commie Care: Nothing Says 'Great Parenting' Like Dumping Your Kids With Randos...
ABC News' Did an On-Air Fact-Check After the Trump Speech They Refused to...

Sen. Josh Hawley Reposts Washington Post Headline: 'Meta Went to Extreme Lengths'

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez, File

"Should be a surprise to absolutely no one," tweets Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), reposting a Washington Post tweet.

Advertisement

The Washington Post tweet reads, "Exclusive: Meta went to extreme lengths, including developing a censorship system, in a failed attempt to bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China, according to a whistleblower complaint."

The phrase "developing a censorship system" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the protection of free speech. The phrase "extreme lengths" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the corruption and disproportionate power of "Big Tech" entities.

Things are not a big deal until they are a big deal. Yes, the 21st Century comes with some technical challenges not before encountered, and those are sometimes delicate to deal with. Such challenges that require balancing include protecting "Big Tech"/media corporations' right to do business, while also protecting speech and privacy concerns of users. A fundamental approach is helpful because it can trim down some of the extra, distilling the heart of the issue. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. Media advancements can be enjoyed without media companies, platforms that facilitate certain media services, being allowed to run roughshod over people.

Advertisement

Power and the abuse of it is what this boils down to. The lack of concern and seeming contempt that some of the big media companies display toward the people who use their services, who benefit their bottom line, is astounding. The seeming contempt that such companies display toward the United States of America, which allows them the freedom to innovate and create the media empires they boast, is equally as astounding. Regulations will always come up short because regulations cannot cover everything. At some point, there must be a willingness among those who hold power in the marketplace to do what is right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement