Ro Khanna Tries TRASHING Former Bernie Sanders Jewish Staffer, THEN the Staffer Shows...
Sleep TIGHT, Virginia! Fairfax County Stings 9 Child Predators BUT This Is Steve...
Hot for HAMAS?! Rep. Dingell GUSHES Over Piker's MUSCLES After Raging at Media...
N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas Wins OK Dem Nod — Then Goes Viral for Video...
UK Home Office Offers Mental Health Services for Staffers Who Fear the Sight...
Rep. Ro Khanna Calls Mark Ruffalo ‘One of the Great Humanitarians of Our...
Brian Krassenstein Deletes Post Announcing His Donation to a Designated Terrorist Organiza...
WaPo: How Did a Costume Resembling Blackface Make It Into Target's Offerings? Systemic...
Borderline Stupid: Chris Cuomo Doubts Dems Will Flood US With Illegal Aliens If...
PA Gov. Josh Shapiro Says He's Suing to Stop 'Unconstitutional' Attempt to Restrict...
Toronto Sun Columnist: New Memo Tells CBC Journalists Not to Refer to 9/11...
BOMBSHELL Study: Trans Ideology Fans More Likely to Back Violence — Including Killing...
Kentucky Fried Nightmare? China KFCs Add Chicken Sandwich With Oreo Cookie-Style Bun to...
Jon Favreau Tries to Contain Backfire for El-Sayed With a 'Stop Talking About...
Judge Lifts Her Nationwide Block on Trump's Mail-In Ballot Executive Order After SCOTUS...

Sen. Josh Hawley Reposts Washington Post Headline: 'Meta Went to Extreme Lengths'

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez, File

"Should be a surprise to absolutely no one," tweets Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), reposting a Washington Post tweet.

Advertisement

The Washington Post tweet reads, "Exclusive: Meta went to extreme lengths, including developing a censorship system, in a failed attempt to bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China, according to a whistleblower complaint."

The phrase "developing a censorship system" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the protection of free speech. The phrase "extreme lengths" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the corruption and disproportionate power of "Big Tech" entities.

Things are not a big deal until they are a big deal. Yes, the 21st Century comes with some technical challenges not before encountered, and those are sometimes delicate to deal with. Such challenges that require balancing include protecting "Big Tech"/media corporations' right to do business, while also protecting speech and privacy concerns of users. A fundamental approach is helpful because it can trim down some of the extra, distilling the heart of the issue. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. Media advancements can be enjoyed without media companies, platforms that facilitate certain media services, being allowed to run roughshod over people.

Advertisement

Power and the abuse of it is what this boils down to. The lack of concern and seeming contempt that some of the big media companies display toward the people who use their services, who benefit their bottom line, is astounding. The seeming contempt that such companies display toward the United States of America, which allows them the freedom to innovate and create the media empires they boast, is equally as astounding. Regulations will always come up short because regulations cannot cover everything. At some point, there must be a willingness among those who hold power in the marketplace to do what is right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement