Monday Morning Meme Madness
Cuba's Dumb Move: Amasses Attack Drones, Threatens Strikes on Guantanamo, U.S. Ships &...
Democrats Bet on a Fraud: The Trust-Fund Kid Dressed Up as Maine’s Oyster...
Foxes in the Henhouse: Illegal Aliens Running Multimillion-Dollar Theft Operations in Amer...
Miracle Ejection: Two Navy Fighter Jets Collide and Explode Over Idaho Airshow
We Chose Travel Scrapbooks Over Babies — DINK Couple’s Peak Cringe Flex Gets...
Political Polls Shows Outcomes for 7 GOP Names Who Voted to Convict
Margot Cleveland Describes It As Disciplining, Not Childishness
Brian Stelter Shares a Bad News Poll for AI
James Woods Predicts Coming Virus Hype
But TRUMP! Mollie Hemingway Takes Chris Cillizza to the CLEANERS for Lame Take...
Jessica Tarlov Insists Trump Doesn't CARE if Americans Struggle and Greg Gutfeld Ain't...
Bully Louise '10-Effin'-1' Lucas BEGS for Virginians to Help Pay Her Legal Fees...
*SNORT* Spencer Pratt's Reaction to Nithya Raman PREENING About Possible Trump Endorsement...
Really, Hakeem? Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson Are Far-Right Extremists? Huh ... Who Knew?

Sen. Josh Hawley Reposts Washington Post Headline: 'Meta Went to Extreme Lengths'

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez, File

"Should be a surprise to absolutely no one," tweets Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), reposting a Washington Post tweet.

Advertisement

The Washington Post tweet reads, "Exclusive: Meta went to extreme lengths, including developing a censorship system, in a failed attempt to bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China, according to a whistleblower complaint."

The phrase "developing a censorship system" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the protection of free speech. The phrase "extreme lengths" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the corruption and disproportionate power of "Big Tech" entities.

Things are not a big deal until they are a big deal. Yes, the 21st Century comes with some technical challenges not before encountered, and those are sometimes delicate to deal with. Such challenges that require balancing include protecting "Big Tech"/media corporations' right to do business, while also protecting speech and privacy concerns of users. A fundamental approach is helpful because it can trim down some of the extra, distilling the heart of the issue. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. Media advancements can be enjoyed without media companies, platforms that facilitate certain media services, being allowed to run roughshod over people.

Advertisement

Power and the abuse of it is what this boils down to. The lack of concern and seeming contempt that some of the big media companies display toward the people who use their services, who benefit their bottom line, is astounding. The seeming contempt that such companies display toward the United States of America, which allows them the freedom to innovate and create the media empires they boast, is equally as astounding. Regulations will always come up short because regulations cannot cover everything. At some point, there must be a willingness among those who hold power in the marketplace to do what is right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement