Kimmel and Colbert Commiserate About the Brutal and Dangerous Job of Late Night...
Georgia’s Youngest Mayor Lasted 10 Months — Impeached Over City Funds and Explicit...
'If Anybody Was Wondering Why Seattle Has Fallen Apart' Watch This Clip of...
AOC Tests Positive for COVID in 2026 — and Half the Internet Acts...
Mamdani’s ‘Normie’ Act Cracks As New Adviser Who Edits ‘Gay Communism,’ Backs Hamas...
NYT Shocking A-HA: Israelis View Themselves As the Victims of the Massacre That...
Meteorologist Chris Martz Obliterates Adam Schiff's Climate Change Panic Button
Letters From the Basement: Afghan Girls Risk Arrest to Learn : Then Hand...
'This You?' Scott Jennings NUKES David Axelrod for Phony Outrage About SCOTUS Criticism
WHOOPS! Gavin Newsom Tried to Pin High Housing Costs on Trump and KO'd...
JD Vance Provides the PERFECT Response After James Talarico Names His 'Favorite' Drag...
Hasan Piker Hates America, Abuses His Dog yet El-Sayed Embraces Him and Campus...
Kamala Harris Makes Articulate, Coherent Post on Dems' Call to Slow AI, Raises...
Mehdi Hasan Marvels at Childlike Ignorance of Brett Kavanaugh Explaining Why 9/11 Happened
Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation

Sen. Josh Hawley Reposts Washington Post Headline: 'Meta Went to Extreme Lengths'

AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez, File

"Should be a surprise to absolutely no one," tweets Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), reposting a Washington Post tweet.

Advertisement

The Washington Post tweet reads, "Exclusive: Meta went to extreme lengths, including developing a censorship system, in a failed attempt to bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China, according to a whistleblower complaint."

The phrase "developing a censorship system" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the protection of free speech. The phrase "extreme lengths" in that headline should induce a chilling effect on anyone concerned about the corruption and disproportionate power of "Big Tech" entities.

Things are not a big deal until they are a big deal. Yes, the 21st Century comes with some technical challenges not before encountered, and those are sometimes delicate to deal with. Such challenges that require balancing include protecting "Big Tech"/media corporations' right to do business, while also protecting speech and privacy concerns of users. A fundamental approach is helpful because it can trim down some of the extra, distilling the heart of the issue. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. Media advancements can be enjoyed without media companies, platforms that facilitate certain media services, being allowed to run roughshod over people.

Advertisement

Power and the abuse of it is what this boils down to. The lack of concern and seeming contempt that some of the big media companies display toward the people who use their services, who benefit their bottom line, is astounding. The seeming contempt that such companies display toward the United States of America, which allows them the freedom to innovate and create the media empires they boast, is equally as astounding. Regulations will always come up short because regulations cannot cover everything. At some point, there must be a willingness among those who hold power in the marketplace to do what is right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement