Buckle Up, New York: You're About to Get What You Voted For With...
Vogue Deletes Post Slamming 'Far-Right' Islamophobe Brigitte Bardot
Experts Say 2025 Was So Hot It Pushed Earth Past Critical Climate Change...
Carol Roth Hilariously Notices Something About Mamdani's Coronation
Call To Activism Bathes in the World's Worst Cologne Over Trump's New Year's...
Judge Rules Trump Administration Can Share Immigrants’ Medicaid Data With ICE
We Don't Believe You: X Users React Skeptically As New CBS Evening News...
Lin-Manuel Miranda Cancels Entire Run of Hamilton at Trump-Kennedy Center
CBS News' New Year's Resolution: More News, Less Elite Opinion
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Scott Jennings Drops Receipts on Hosts Denying Tim Walz Linked Fraud Probes to...
A New Year's Message From Twitchy Managing Editor Sam Janney
MeidasTouch Dork SUPER STOKED Over 4 Kids in Somali Daycare Shows Just How...
The 2025 Primetime Cable Ratings Are Out, and YIKES for the Lib Nets
Quality 'Learing' Center Adds New 'Touches' to Prove YES, THEY ARE OPEN and...

'Keep the staff safe': WH's stated reason for restricting media access to border patrol facilities slammed as an 'audacious lie'

The lack of media access to migrant holding facilities along the U.S. southern border is an issue which ‘Fox News Sunday’ host Chris Wallace pressed White House press secretary Jen Psaki about during a recent interview. Psaki maintains that the administration is “committed” to media access but cites coronavirus concerns as the limiting factor thus far.

Advertisement

About a timeline for allowing access, no indication is given by Psaki.

“You are being less transparent than the Trump administration,” is quite a line from Wallace.

To further the point made by Wallace, if the previous occupant of the White House had revoked media access to any major facility such as this, what would the reaction have been?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement