Puzzling Presidency: Scott Jennings Easily Flips ‘Who’s Running The Country?’ Question on...
By the Numbers? Pentagon Official Stuns By Saying They Miscounted Troops in Syria
Breakdown to Break Down? GOP Possibly Considering Splitting Up Spending Bill Into Smaller...
Christopher Hayes: World's Richest Man Took $190 Million Away From Kids With Cancer
Kill Bill: MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Laments ‘Threat’ Voters Pose to Unresponsive Elected Official...
Avenging Avatar: Legacy Media Grapples With Musk Making Voters the Center of the...
Chuck Todd Thinks Democracy Means Doing What Democrats Want, Even When Republicans Win
Some Experts Are More Equal Than Others: Australia Prosecutes Expert for Saying Men...
What About The Farmers and Disaster Victims? Dems Chant 'Hell No' to CR...
MSNBC Continues the Belt-Tightening: Joy Reid, Stephanie Ruhle Offered Pay Cuts As Network...
Vox Tries to Explain to Why We Praise Daniel Penny and Condemn Luigi...
George Stephanopoulos (D)efied Producer on 'Rape' Because His Job Isn't Journalism, It's A...
SHUT IT DOWN: New Continuing Resolution Fails to Pass
Rep. Richard Neal Fears the Power of a 'Tweet From Someone Who Has...
Make It Make Sense: Ron DeSantis Points Out Left's Hypocrisy on Billionaires in...

'Ashamed' Jewish Chronicle reporter explains his powerful change of heart after ripping Israel

Jewish Chronicle reporter Daniel Sugarman admitted Thursday that something he wrote on Tuesday was way off base.

Advertisement

He had written that Israel should be ashamed of the way it was treating and inciting the residents of Gaza. Upon reflection, Sugarman did something that very few in today’s media have the courage to do — admitted he was wrong.

This is what he says led him to write what he did initially:

“On the left, in Jerusalem, I saw happy faces. Self-congratulatory faces. I saw the Prime Minister of Israel talking about how the opening of the US embassy in Jerusalem was a big step towards peace.

And on the right, simultaneously, in Gaza, I saw tear gas, and smoke, and bullets.”

And this is what he says caused his change of heart:

I failed to acknowledge that, either way, Israel would be giving Hamas what it wanted. Shoot at those charging at you and Hamas would have its martyrs. Fail to shoot and Hamas would break through the barrier and bring suffering and death – its stated aim – to Israelis living only a few hundred metres away from that barrier. The march may have originally been, as it was declared to be, about Palestinians returning to the homes they had to leave 70 years before. But Hamas’s aim was far more straightforward – “We will take down the border and we will tear out their hearts from their bodies.”

Advertisement

Indeed. Credit to Sugarman for being willing to be wrong.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement