No Teleprompter or Script? Trump Says Victory Speech Will Come From the Heart,...
BOOMITY! Greg Gutfeld ERUPTS on Government Toadies Who Killed Peanut the Squirrel and...
Dairy State Dispatch: Let's Check in on Where Wisconsin Stands (So Far)
Joy Behar Declares She Would Rather Die Than Have a Republican Save Her...
Even Cooper Doesn't Buy It: Amy Klobuchar Says SO MANY Conservatives Have Told...
AOC Thinks Voting for Kamala Harris Will Control the Weather in New York
Manhattan Mayhem as Democrats Face Off Against Vengeful Squirrels and Raccoons on Election...
RUN A PICK SIX! Tim Walz Tried a 'Game Day' Tweet for Election...
The Real Life 'Tony Stark' Proclaims Men Are Coming to Save America with...
BOOM: Insurrection Barbie Reminds Us Why We Need to Vote Trump for Our...
COPIUM Alert: Former WH Comms Director Ignores Reality, Says Trump Failed to Expand...
Obama Lackey Ben Rhodes Wants Us All to Know Kamala Really Stepped Up...
J.D. Vance's Dog Atlas Turns One and Wants Us All to Go Vote...
James Woods Takes 'Catastrophe' Kamala Harris APART Point by Point in EPIC Post...
Quick, Call Rep. Hank Johnson! Guam Didn't Capsize, but Does Flip Republican for...

Univ. of Wash. professor challenges the CDC over the 5-day isolation requirement

Carl Bergstrom, a professor at the University of Washington whose work on COVID-19 has been widely cited in the media from nearly Day One of the pandemic, is challenging the new CDC guidelines that “reduced the isolation period after a positive test from 10 days to 5 days for asymptomatic individuals.”

Advertisement

“I like the idea of allowing people to exit isolation earlier than after ten days, but doing so without one or more negative tests seems odd,” he said:

Whispers: There are no tests because the Biden administration did not prioritize tests:

Bergstrom then argued that the reason testing is so important is that there is a  “broad range of infectious periods, with a non-trivial fraction going well beyond five days”:

Even the scientists don’t believe the CDC when they say it was based on science?

Advertisement

Show your work, CDC!

Bergstrom also pointed out that the language from the CDC is confusing. Here the CDC says “if asymptomatic”:

But, later on, the CDC talks about symptoms “that are resolving” which isn’t the same thing:

He ended the thread with this criticism of Dr. Fauci in that video we just told you about:

Advertisement

And if it’s not clear yet, he’s mocking the CDC:

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1475807701686882309

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1475713334485794816

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1475707838391472131

Maybe it’s because we’re still in the Christmas hangover phase of the news cycle, but the CDC change is not going the way Team Biden hoped it would go:

To be continued. . .

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement