Senator James Lankford Speaks Out About Recent Terror Designations At Fort Liberty
Bidenomics, Baby! Survey Reveals Economy Is Election's Biggest Issue (DUH!), and GOP Shoul...
Molly Jong-Fast Is the Latest Leftist Entering The Anger Phase of Grief Regarding...
Unable to Run on His Own Platform, Biden Says Project 2025 'Biggest Attack'...
Biden Insists in Vaguely Threatening Post His Campaign Isn't About His Legacy but...
WATCH: Biden Lies and Rambles His Way Through Michigan Campaign Stop
BREAKING: Criminal Case Against Alec Baldwin Dismissed! (Can There Be Another Trial?)
If You Have to Tell Someone You're Okay, You're NOT OKAY: Biden Promises...
Joy Reid: It's Okay Biden Mixed Up Names, Cause She Does It Too...
LOL WUT? Documentary Says Abraham Lincoln Had 'Secret' Gay Life
A Nightmare for Democrats Is Music to Trump's Ears!
WH Transcript Cleans Up Biden's Press Conference Remark about 'Vice President Trump'
WHCA President Says Press Doesn't Coordinate With WH (People Have Questions and Pics)
Lefty Insisting THIS Joe Biden Isn't the SAME Joe Biden They Voted for...
BREAKING: NYT Reports Donors to LARGEST Biden Super PAC Will Freeze Donations IF...

NYT photographer debunks AOC's dopey Hope Hicks 'glamour shot' narrative

As we told you over the weekend, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (and others!) were quite miffed at the New York Times for running this “glamour shot” of Hope Hicks along with an article on whether or not she will comply with a House subpoena:


Here’s the photo from the NYT’s Tom Brenner that set her off:

Now for the real story. That photo is not a “glamour shot” at all and was just a normal photo of Hicks at work:

Brenner didn’t even know Hicks would be in the room before he took the photo:


And we’ll note that maybe AOC is not the best one to be complaining about using glamour shots to humanize someone in politics. Remember this?




Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos