Libs are pretty psyched that Charlie Kirk was hospitalized in Los Angeles

Greg P. | 11:43 AM on January 22, 2019

Parkland survivor and TPUSA activist Kyle Kashuv tweeted last night that Charlie Kirk was hospitalized with a bad back and a potential blood clot along with this photo of Kirk laying on a bench outside of the ER because, according to Kashuv, there were no beds immediately available:

I'm with my buddy @charliekirk11 in Los Angeles who was rushed to the hospital for a potential blood clot

He threw out his back and can't stand and the hospital said there are no beds available and suggested he lay on a bench outside

Cedar Sinai Hospital, disgrace!!! pic.twitter.com/ONNnOBiUOC

— Kyle Kashuv (@KyleKashuv) January 22, 2019

A few hours later, Kashuv gave this update from a hospital bed:

.@charliekirk11 is doing better.
He “can’t stand. But still stands for freedom.” pic.twitter.com/8roLez3uaz

— Kyle Kashuv (@KyleKashuv) January 22, 2019

Kirk just gave an update that he still “cannot stand or walk”:

Still cannot stand or walk, but despite all the leftists commenting wishing for my suffering to continue or my imminent death, don’t worry I’ll be just fine. https://t.co/qs34VcUR06

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 22, 2019

Libs, as you’d expect, were quite giddy at Kirk’s suffering:

I'm laughing so hard that I can't breathe at Charlie Kirk forgetting to take his wristband off before pretending that the hospital wouldn't admit him because they gave all their beds to people on food stamps or whatever pic.twitter.com/WEb2VJPFEP

— Creighton M (@Creighton_Mc) January 22, 2019

Except Kirk and Kashuv never made this claim, but whatever. It’s quite clear to us that Kirk was triaged when he first arrived and then he had to wait for a bed. It is quite odd that they couldn’t accommodate a patient in that much pain, no?