WSJ Editorial Features editor James Taranto had a good thread on Sunday where he breaks down the New York Times’ “atrocious journalism” from their article titled, “Without Evidence, Trump Claims Vindication From Release of Carter Page Documents.”
Have a read:
Here is an example of how antagonism toward Trump produces atrocious journalism.
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) July 22, 2018
Times news story lede begins: "President Trump claimed without evidence…" https://t.co/NXynUWQV1D pic.twitter.com/hpuL056kmi
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) July 22, 2018
In fact, there is evidence, namely the FISA warrants, which were released IN RESPONSE TO A FOIA REQUEST FROM THE TIMES. https://t.co/kttDuwG7De pic.twitter.com/rBDEA76yWh
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) July 22, 2018
When today's story says "without evidence," what it means is that the reporters disagree with the president's interpretation of the evidence.
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) July 22, 2018
Perhaps the reporters have the better of the argument, though I tend to think it's not the place of a news reporter to be making such arguments.
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) July 22, 2018
Recommended
But "without evidence" signals that they have prejudged the case–that they are not approaching the question honestly. Even if the story is solid, the lede taints it. I didn't read on.
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) July 22, 2018
What’s even worse is that former NYT public editor and current Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan saw no problem with the article or headline:
This NYT headline, and story framing, seems about right to me. …. Without Evidence, Trump Claims Vindication From Release of Carter Page Documents https://t.co/glAVODC7TE
— Margaret Sullivan (@Sulliview) July 22, 2018
Sigh.
***
Join the conversation as a VIP Member