Fan of October 7 Attack Elected to Public Office in Britain
LOL: J.B. Pritzker's 'May the Fourth' Post Made Millions of Voices Suddenly Cry...
'60 Minutes' Features Two High School Seniors Who Solved 'Impossible' Mathematical Puzzle
Identity of Biden Fanboy on Election Panel Exposed and It Explans Everything
President Biden Awards Presidential Medal of Freedom to Greatest Speaker in History
Twitter Tries to Get to the Bottom of Biden's Walk with Some Solid...
ASU Students Arrested During Protests Won't Be Able to Finish Final Exams
Just for Fun: Some of the Best Tweets Leading Up to the 'Kentucky...
Student Protesters Trash Car That ‘Targeted’ Them; ‘This Wasn’t an Accident’
Protestors Compare Campus Riots to 1968 Movement but Americans Aren't Buying It
Covington 2.0? The Hill Says GOP Rep. Applauds Counter-Protesters Who Taunted Black Woman
Almost Snakes on a Plane? Miami TSSSsssSSSA Snags a Bag of Snakes From...
Biden Reminds Us to Vote for the Candidate Who Ignores SCOTUS Rulings in...
White House Isn't Finished Trying to Milk Every Ounce of Cringe Out of...
WOMP WOMP! Hims Stock Tanks After CEO Praises 'Moral Courage' of Antisemitic Campus...

NYT warns of the deadly proliferation of '.50-caliber sniper rifles' since expiration of assault weapons ban

Watch out, America. According to editors at the New York Times, the expiration of the assault weapons ban has led to 18-year-olds running around with .50-caliber sniper rifles that can “pierce concrete bunkers and armored personnel carriers”:

Advertisement

From their editorial:

Assault weapons were banned for 10 years until Congress, in bipartisan obeisance to the gun lobby, let the law lapse in 2004. As a result, gun manufacturers have been allowed to sell all manner of war weaponry to civilians, including the super destructive .50-caliber sniper rifle, which an 18-year-old can easily buy in many places even where he or she must be 21 to buy a simpler handgun. Why any civilian would need this weapon, designed to pierce concrete bunkers and armored personnel carriers, is a question that should be put to the gun makers who profit from them and the politicians who shamelessly do their bidding.

Of course, the fact that .50-caliber sniper rifles were never covered by the assault weapons ban escaped the NYT’s fact-checkers:

From Sean Davis of The Federalist:

Those icky guns aren’t just destructive, they’re super destructive. There’s just one teeny, tiny problem with that paragraph: bolt-action .50-caliber rifles were never covered by the federal assault weapons ban. There’s no possible way the expiration of the assault weapons ban could have led to the proliferation of a weapon that was never actually banned by the law, but editorial page editor Andy Rosenthal has never been one to let simple facts get in the way of an unhinged screed.

And the rifles are expensive, weigh a ton and according to Davis, have “never” been used in a mass shooting in the U.S.:

https://twitter.com/aporterwrites/status/675409497024671744

You can read the rest of Davis’ take-down of the New York Times here.

 

 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement