Pulitzer-prize winning columnist makes EMBARRASSING correction to her WaPost piece on what Kamala Harris wore to the debate

Jun 29, 2019 8:40 AM
Advertisement
Pulitzer-prize winning columnist makes EMBARRASSING correction to her WaPost piece on what Kamala Harris wore to the debate

Does anyone really care that Kamala Harris wore black to the debate, or even notice? From the Washington Post’s Robin Givhan:

Advertisement

But people quickly came to Givhan’s defense, noting that she does have a Pulitzer for her past work and that this is an important piece of writing:

And if we criticize it, we’re being misogynistic:

OK, so let’s go read the article, shall we? Here’s the opener. Well, the corrected opener, anyway. . .

She was wearing navy, not black:

HAHAHA! So, why is the Washington Post keeping up the “black” headline? And as for the point of the article — that a woman wore dark colors on a debate stage in the first place, is it really that remarkable? From 2016:

Advertisement

Thank you, Hillary, for breaking the “navy” suit ceiling?

***

Related:

 

News Topics 2020 | KAMALA HARRIS

Comments

VIP

Join the Conversation

VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy: Hilarious Political Commentary & Current Events Videos