Here's the Pardon/Commutation Count for the Last Few Presidents (and Biden's Not Done...
It was There All Along: Senate Passes Child Cancer Research Bill The House...
Here He Comes! Possibility of Kash Patel Running the FBI Has Rattled Nerves...
Trope Trounced: Van Jones Foolishly Plays the ‘Unelected Billionaire’ Card on Scott Jennin...
Life in Prison? Biden Reportedly Mulling Erasing Death Sentences for Several Inmates
Depressed Mode: Fashion-Forward or Step Backward? Reactions to Ella Emhoff’s Prada Pics
Mike Johnson Criticized As the CR Heads to the Senate: Brit Hume Asks,...
White House Cover-Up: Scott Jennings Asks Will Dems Who Lied for Biden Be...
The Third Spending Bill Passed the House Avoiding a Government Shutdown
Jacqui Heinrich Explains Why KJP Did Not Get 1 Q About WSJ's Report...
The Official 'Democrats' Account Tried to Own Trump, but Twitter Absolutely Dragged Them
Music Industry Tools, Rage Against The Machine Discovers The Joy of Selling Out...
Democrat Caught Lying about Residency Flips Minnesota House Back to GOP
'The Vehicles Are at It Again!' Driver Plowed Through a Christmas Market and...
Shocker: The 'Impossible' Thing Dems Said Would Never Happen, Totally Happened Again

Former president of Estonia not happy with Tucker Carlson's segment on NATO and the Baltic states

Toomas Hendrik Ilves, former president of Estonia, is not happy with Tucker Carlson after a segment last night where the Fox News host questioned if the “average American” knows our NATO commitment means “we’re on the hook” to defend the Baltic states from an attack from Russia:

Advertisement

Ilves noted that Estonia, which is a NATO member, sent troops and suffered casualties in support of the United States in Afghanistan:

From the article where Carlson asked if the U.S. should use resources to defend “the territorial integrity of Estonia”:

Carlson played clips from several “neocon” and liberal pundits and officials who warned that President Trump is playing with 25th Amendment fire if he considers such actions.

Carlson said the Soviet Union fell more than 25 years ago and that the Russian Federation that replaced it is in no state to “invade” western Europe.

“Why shouldn’t we have a debate about Article 5 [which] obligates us to defend other [NATO] states?” Carlson asked David Tafuri.

He asked why the United States should commit major resources to something like “the territorial integrity of Estonia.”

And here’s the bit about what does or does not the average American know about NATO:

“That’s what we’d be obligated to do,” Carlson said. “In other words, our kids get to die for Latvia because it somehow protects the rule of law to do that.”

“Does the average American know we’re on the hook for this?” Carlson said.

Advertisement

Carlson is getting criticized over his comments, but we expect a poll asking Americans if they support sending troops to the Baltic states to defend against a Russian invasion and potentially WWIII would not go the way people like former Russian ambassador Michael McFaul think it will go:

***

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement