Ezra Klein and the NYT Ask a VERY Stupid Question; Twitter Obliges Them...
An Inside Look at AMFEST 2025 — Chloe and Willie Bring Us The Hottest...
'This Is Amazing': Rep. Jasmine Crockett Says the Right Fears Her Authenticity (Roll...
Leftists Lose It Over Bari Weiss's Sane Memo: 'Just Add Context and Sources'...
Mass Deportation Checks Tripled: Kristi Noem Gets Serious
Tubba Bubba Exposed: Eli Lake Demands Clinton Accountability Over Damning Epstein Photos—I...
The Spiciest, Weirdest, and Funniest Hot Takes From TPUSA’s AmericaFest 2025
Governor DeSantis Drops Truth Bomb: Stop the Student Loan Scam by Making Unis...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Time Again to Play 'Media Headline vs. the Actual Story' About a 'Father...
Erin Go BLECH! New Ireland President Leaves Out a Pretty Key Detail From...
Glenn Greenwald's Anti-Israel Stance Sounds Increasingly Like Candace Owens' Brainrot
Guy Benson Has a Reminder About the 60 Minutes Journo Who Said Bari...
Journos Say CBS News/60 Minutes Destroyed Credibility by Delaying Deportee Story (Yeah, Ab...
Virginia Is for Lovers...of Illegal Alien Criminals: A Man Is Dead After Sheriff...

New spin from team Clinton: Emails were top secret, but totally 'innocuous,' so leave poor Hillary alone!

Hillary Clinton’s press secretary Brian Fallon share a new theory on the top secret emails found on her private server. They’re “top secret,” but “innocuous” so it’s no big deal:

Advertisement

So, who are the “officials” that decided the emails were “innocuous”? We don’t know, of course, because they won’t go on the record. And it wasn’t until the 11th paragraph that NBC got around to telling readers that the “officials” have an ax to grind:

The description of the emails as relatively innocuous came from officials, including a senior U.S. intelligence official, who believe Inspector General McCullough has been unfair to Clinton in his handling of the issue. They say McCullough and Congressional Republicans have elevated a mundane dispute about classification into a scandal.

They point out that McCullough, a career intelligence official, contributed $1,000 to George W. Bush’s 2004 presidential campaign.

“They” pointed out that McCullough was a Bush donor? “They” all decided to look that up themselves and tell NBC News the exact same thing when interviewed? Really?

Anyway, “innocuous” or not, it’s still a problem no matter how they spin it:

https://twitter.com/Jack0Spades/status/690163554398400512

Advertisement

And let’s not forget the potential conflict of interest thanks to Chelsea’s former employment at NBC:

https://twitter.com/RepublicanPunk/status/689954328245882880

NBC does have one on-the-record source for the piece — Brian Fallon, himself:

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said the latest information about the emails makes it “absurd to suggest that Secretary Clinton did anything wrong.”

He added, “Both the sending and the leaking of [the IG’s] letter was a reckless and irresponsible act.”

If we were the skeptical type, we’d almost think that maybe Fallon was the guy who arranged for the “officials” to get interviewed by NBC in the first place.

***

Related:

Clinton camp’s Brian Fallon accuses Intel inspector general of conspiring with GOP

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement