Dem Tim Walz Calls Limping Shooting Victim Steve Scalise ‘Boot Licker’ for Online...
Adam McKay Calls Out White Liberals, There's Only One Problem
The Kiss of Darth: Pedro Pascal Smooches Stephen Colbert While Promoting Family-Friendly S...
Hasan Piker Scoffs at Israeli Govt.’s Plan to File Lawsuit Over Nicholas Kristof’s...
Dem Jasmine Crockett Claims Constitution-Minded SCOTUS Justices Are Partisans Doing Trump’...
Justice Department Investigation Shows Yale Discriminated Against Whites and Asians in Adm...
CIA Accuses Senate Committee of ‘Dishonest Political Theater’ Over Lab Leak Coverup
Tlaib's Endless Nakba Lie: Celebrating Arab Defeat as 'Genocide' While Demanding Israel's...
Cato Stooge: One in Five Fairfax Residents Is or Lives With Someone Who...
NBC News: Dems Are Moving on to a More Combative Style of Politics
Trump Calls Him a Disaster, Dem Ro Khanna Calls Him a Founder’s Ideal:...
Pink Bullhorn Dummy Gets Rare Reprimand: Angie Nixon Turns FL House Floor Into...
Cry More, Marj: Dana Loesch Roasts MTG’s Suspicious Stock Trading Spree and Stock...
Biden’s Secret: He Gave Foreign Workers Homes with ZERO Money Down —...
AP Warns That Revolutionary War-Era Muskets Are Mostly Exempt From Gun Laws in...

Scientific American's Misinformation Crusade Is So Science-y and Whatnot

ImgFlip

Scientific American is deeply concerned about the upcoming election. Rumors, lies, misinformation, disinformation, and even innuendo are bombarding voters on social media. Who can we, the average, everyday American voter, possibly trust to discern the truth from the lies? 

Advertisement

Thankfully, Scientific American is here to help. Together, with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, they are going to use science and ongoing social media research to identify and quickly counter misinformation!

See! We can trust them. They have a misinformation expert and are only interested in the truth and will be completely non-partisan!

The article continues.

Using ongoing social-media research conducted at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, which I co-lead, my colleagues and I can identify rumors spreading across both Democratic and Republican online networks in real time. We can see how election rumors emerge as events unfold, and how they frequently combine first-hand accounts, such as photos or videos, with pre-existing narratives, for example that non-US citizens vote in large numbers.

There's no mention of rumors of Trump being a fascist or things like the Steele Dossier, nothing about Project 2025. Just illegals voting and suspicious vans full of uncounted ballots. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. They're probably just busy analyzing data and doing peer reviews and other highly scientific stuff. We imagine there's a petri dish or a microscope involved somewhere!

Advertisement

What? Silence conservatives! This just can't be! Can it? They're scientists, they're not political, they're only concerned with finding the truth! We're shocked, flabbergasted!

But we were told we could trust the science! We are shaken! Gobsmacked!

Is there anywhere we can turn to for unbiased scientific analysis?

The frog's in a lab, therefore his conclusions are above reproach!

Trust the science!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos