John Pavlovitz Defends Fauci by Reminding Us That Rand Paul Isn’t a Doctor
Lost and Tossed: DSA Co-Chair Serves Up Word Salad When Pushed on ‘Open...
'Cancel Thanksgiving' Francesca Hong Says All Her Opponent Talks About Is Culture Wars
'Get Comfy Being Ruthless,' Says Kamala — Same Party That Already Tried Everything...
Vice President JD Vance on 'Odd' Abdul El-Sayed: 'The Guy's Crazy and Would...
Bad Sign for the Left? Jill Biden Aide Crosses Party Lines to Endorse...
Attorneys General From Three States Subpoena Anthony Fauci
WNBA Commissioner Reacts to Two Male Ex-NBA Players Vying to Join the Women’s...
Hasan Piker Imagines the Complaints If Charlie Kirk Were Stumping for GOP Candidates
Royce White Says She's Getting Hate When She Just Wants to Hoop With...
Terrible Person, Worse Comedian: Mike Rogers Gets the Last Laugh As El-Sayed’s Zinger...
Francesca Hong Will NOT Like Bill Maher's Take on Her Sudden Embrace of...
David Weigel Demands Evidence of El-Sayed’s Violent Rhetoric ... X Hands Him a...
'I Think Someone's Nervous!' Gavin Newsom's in a Panic Over the Senate Confirming...
Let the Tantrums Begin: Left Wing Tears Flow As Todd Blanche Is Confirmed...

Scientific American's Misinformation Crusade Is So Science-y and Whatnot

ImgFlip

Scientific American is deeply concerned about the upcoming election. Rumors, lies, misinformation, disinformation, and even innuendo are bombarding voters on social media. Who can we, the average, everyday American voter, possibly trust to discern the truth from the lies? 

Advertisement

Thankfully, Scientific American is here to help. Together, with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, they are going to use science and ongoing social media research to identify and quickly counter misinformation!

See! We can trust them. They have a misinformation expert and are only interested in the truth and will be completely non-partisan!

The article continues.

Using ongoing social-media research conducted at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, which I co-lead, my colleagues and I can identify rumors spreading across both Democratic and Republican online networks in real time. We can see how election rumors emerge as events unfold, and how they frequently combine first-hand accounts, such as photos or videos, with pre-existing narratives, for example that non-US citizens vote in large numbers.

There's no mention of rumors of Trump being a fascist or things like the Steele Dossier, nothing about Project 2025. Just illegals voting and suspicious vans full of uncounted ballots. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. They're probably just busy analyzing data and doing peer reviews and other highly scientific stuff. We imagine there's a petri dish or a microscope involved somewhere!

Advertisement

What? Silence conservatives! This just can't be! Can it? They're scientists, they're not political, they're only concerned with finding the truth! We're shocked, flabbergasted!

But we were told we could trust the science! We are shaken! Gobsmacked!

Is there anywhere we can turn to for unbiased scientific analysis?

The frog's in a lab, therefore his conclusions are above reproach!

Trust the science!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement