How Low Can They Go? Lefty 'Morgan Freeman' Equates Masked Man Stalking Elderly...
Stephen Miller Flashes Back to 'Stunning Visuals' From Biden's Border Invasion That Trump...
Scott Jennings (and MANY Others) Mock Axios for REFUSING to Give Trump Credit...
Axios Repeats the Democrat Lie That the SAVE Act Would Prevent 'Millions of...
Beshear: 'DeSantis Is the Worst!' Translation: Notice Me, I'm Riding Daddy's Coattails Whi...
Duh Moment at WaPo: Fired Employees Baffled by Turned-Off Computers and Door Badges
Born in America, Trained in America, Sold Out to Commie China: NBC Can't...
Joy Reid Says MSNBC Hosts Were Not Allowed to Lie Due to Journalistic...
Lame Claim: Governor Tim Walz Says Forget the Feds, Prosecuting Fraud in Minnesota...
Scott Jennings Says Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear Proved He’s No Moderate Democrat While...
Woman Says If You Are White, You Cannot Trust Your Own Thinking on...
Facelifts and ‘Fascist’ Grift: Lefty Podcast Jennifer Welch Cuts Promo Ad for Upcoming...
Attorney Freezes When Asked How His Client Returned to $2.3 Million Mansion She’d...
Team USA Curler Would Be Remiss Not to Mention What’s Going on in...
NBC News: Lawyer Says Toddler Returned to ICE Detention and Denied Prescription Medication

Scientific American's Misinformation Crusade Is So Science-y and Whatnot

ImgFlip

Scientific American is deeply concerned about the upcoming election. Rumors, lies, misinformation, disinformation, and even innuendo are bombarding voters on social media. Who can we, the average, everyday American voter, possibly trust to discern the truth from the lies? 

Advertisement

Thankfully, Scientific American is here to help. Together, with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, they are going to use science and ongoing social media research to identify and quickly counter misinformation!

See! We can trust them. They have a misinformation expert and are only interested in the truth and will be completely non-partisan!

The article continues.

Using ongoing social-media research conducted at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, which I co-lead, my colleagues and I can identify rumors spreading across both Democratic and Republican online networks in real time. We can see how election rumors emerge as events unfold, and how they frequently combine first-hand accounts, such as photos or videos, with pre-existing narratives, for example that non-US citizens vote in large numbers.

There's no mention of rumors of Trump being a fascist or things like the Steele Dossier, nothing about Project 2025. Just illegals voting and suspicious vans full of uncounted ballots. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. They're probably just busy analyzing data and doing peer reviews and other highly scientific stuff. We imagine there's a petri dish or a microscope involved somewhere!

Advertisement

What? Silence conservatives! This just can't be! Can it? They're scientists, they're not political, they're only concerned with finding the truth! We're shocked, flabbergasted!

But we were told we could trust the science! We are shaken! Gobsmacked!

Is there anywhere we can turn to for unbiased scientific analysis?

The frog's in a lab, therefore his conclusions are above reproach!

Trust the science!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement