Hasan Holiday: Neera Tanden Wants Piker to Take a Hike but Appears Keen...
Naked Partisanship: Jen Psaki’s Fake Outrage Over Sydney Sweeney’s Nude Betting Ad Gets...
Zoinks!: Courtroom Sketch of Terror Suspect Has X Talking ‘Scooby Snacks’ and Making...
The Economy’s Dead? Somebody Better Tell Toys ‘R’ Us
Shame on You, Jarvis: Nancy Mace Tells Men to Stop Sending Her 'Nasty'...
Mid-Trial, Jurors Were Thinking of Doing a Joint Press Conference on Postpartum Depression
Dem. Senate Candidate Would Trade Five Americans for One Illegal Alien Farmworker
University of California Students May Struggle With Basic Math but Are Graduating at...
'Legal Observer' Witnessed a Forklift Run Into the Kennedy Center Pillars 'Several Times'
Maria Salazar Warns Trump His Immigration Enforcement Efforts Have Gone Too Far in...
Bernie Sanders Butthurt That Billionaire Stadium Owners Can ‘Silence’ Artists Who Speak Ou...
SCIENCE! The New Yorker Believes That You CAN, Actually, Get a 'Little Bit...
CNN’s Dana Bash Says ‘It’s Just Gross’ That Michigan Voters Wouldn’t Vote for...
Insane: X Puts Abi Spanberger on Blast After Report of yet ANOTHER Illegal...
Gavin Newsom Rake Stomps Again While Pointing Out How Much Gas Prices Have...

Scientific American's Misinformation Crusade Is So Science-y and Whatnot

ImgFlip

Scientific American is deeply concerned about the upcoming election. Rumors, lies, misinformation, disinformation, and even innuendo are bombarding voters on social media. Who can we, the average, everyday American voter, possibly trust to discern the truth from the lies? 

Advertisement

Thankfully, Scientific American is here to help. Together, with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, they are going to use science and ongoing social media research to identify and quickly counter misinformation!

See! We can trust them. They have a misinformation expert and are only interested in the truth and will be completely non-partisan!

The article continues.

Using ongoing social-media research conducted at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, which I co-lead, my colleagues and I can identify rumors spreading across both Democratic and Republican online networks in real time. We can see how election rumors emerge as events unfold, and how they frequently combine first-hand accounts, such as photos or videos, with pre-existing narratives, for example that non-US citizens vote in large numbers.

There's no mention of rumors of Trump being a fascist or things like the Steele Dossier, nothing about Project 2025. Just illegals voting and suspicious vans full of uncounted ballots. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. They're probably just busy analyzing data and doing peer reviews and other highly scientific stuff. We imagine there's a petri dish or a microscope involved somewhere!

Advertisement

What? Silence conservatives! This just can't be! Can it? They're scientists, they're not political, they're only concerned with finding the truth! We're shocked, flabbergasted!

But we were told we could trust the science! We are shaken! Gobsmacked!

Is there anywhere we can turn to for unbiased scientific analysis?

The frog's in a lab, therefore his conclusions are above reproach!

Trust the science!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement