Trump Shuts Down Foreign Money Pipeline: Media Panics As JD Vance Locks in
MN Protester DUMB Enough to Brag to Laura Ingraham About Getting PAID to...
Ken Jennings Still Sucks. That's It. That's the Headline
Mollie Hemingway Has a Reminder About NYT and WaPo After These Analyses of...
'Get Some Lunch, BIG BOY': New Disturbing POV MN Shooting Footage Shows ICE...
Heifer PUH-LEASE: Jasmine Crockett Tells DOOZY of a Charlie Kirk Lie to SHAME...
Major Reveal, LITERALLY: POLITICO Accidentally Links to Revealing Internal Doc (Knew It Wa...
Spot the Not-So-Subtle Differences Between NY Post and CNN Takes on the Minneapolis...
Loser's Libelous Lectern Lie Lost
Asra Nomani Shares Infuriating DEEP DIVE on FAR-Left Network Behind Anti-ICE Protests Acro...
If Dems Want to Know Who to Blame for ICE Officers Having to...
KNEW It! Julie Kelly Exposes Renee Good's Wife, Her Connections to MN ICE...
So, About That LUNATIC Alleged 'Trump Supporter' Screaming About EXECUTING People in MN...
Anti-ICE Protesters Being Coached Before Press Conference Say the Quiet Part Out Loud
WATCH CNN's Anderson Cooper 'Play' Dumb About New MN Footage That Only JUSTIFIES...

Scientific American's Misinformation Crusade Is So Science-y and Whatnot

ImgFlip

Scientific American is deeply concerned about the upcoming election. Rumors, lies, misinformation, disinformation, and even innuendo are bombarding voters on social media. Who can we, the average, everyday American voter, possibly trust to discern the truth from the lies? 

Advertisement

Thankfully, Scientific American is here to help. Together, with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, they are going to use science and ongoing social media research to identify and quickly counter misinformation!

See! We can trust them. They have a misinformation expert and are only interested in the truth and will be completely non-partisan!

The article continues.

Using ongoing social-media research conducted at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public in Seattle, which I co-lead, my colleagues and I can identify rumors spreading across both Democratic and Republican online networks in real time. We can see how election rumors emerge as events unfold, and how they frequently combine first-hand accounts, such as photos or videos, with pre-existing narratives, for example that non-US citizens vote in large numbers.

There's no mention of rumors of Trump being a fascist or things like the Steele Dossier, nothing about Project 2025. Just illegals voting and suspicious vans full of uncounted ballots. I'm sure that's just a coincidence. They're probably just busy analyzing data and doing peer reviews and other highly scientific stuff. We imagine there's a petri dish or a microscope involved somewhere!

Advertisement

What? Silence conservatives! This just can't be! Can it? They're scientists, they're not political, they're only concerned with finding the truth! We're shocked, flabbergasted!

But we were told we could trust the science! We are shaken! Gobsmacked!

Is there anywhere we can turn to for unbiased scientific analysis?

The frog's in a lab, therefore his conclusions are above reproach!

Trust the science!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement