Bake the Cake, Bigot: X Reminds Governor Polis What Rolling Back Freedoms Actually...
Outlier Out-and-Out Liar: Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question About Dems’ Record Low Approval...
But Trump! Tim Kaine Isn’t Too Worried His Former Running Mate’s Husband Is...
Christmas Came Early: Andrew Tate Finally Meets a Man Who Hits Back –...
Kaaa-BOOM! Anna Paulina Luna OBLITERATES Uber-Creepy Scott Wiener In Heated Exchange
The Rot in California: Jury Says It's OK to Tow Federal Vehicles During...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
No, Seth Moulton, You Are Not God; You Don't Get to Define What...
Sen. John Kennedy Calls for 'Another Reconciliation Bill'
Surprise! Nicki Minaj Electrifies at AmFest, Standing Up for Trump and Global Christians
Rob Schneider Brings the House Down -- and More Importantly, Together -- At...
Tulsi Gabbard Goes Off on Islamism: A Brutal Wake-Up Call for America Before...
DOJ: 'We Will Bring Charges Against Anyone Involved in the Trafficking and Exploitation'
Hugh Hewitt on 'GOP's Nominee': 'The Assumption of No Challengers Is Naive'
Jamie Raskin Tries Playing STUPID on CNN About the MANY Pictures of Bill...

NY Times' Issues a Doozy of a 'Correction' to Their Charlie Kirk Story (and It's STILL Misleading)

Meme

The New York Times has done it again.

Their obituary for Charlie Kirk was shameful enough, and in a separate story, titled "where Charlie Kirk stood on key political issues," the Times listed categories like climate change, race, free speech and antisemitism. 

Advertisement

In the Times' story about where Kirk stood, you won't be surprised to know that there were some inaccuracies, and they've now added a correction to the end of the story. This is a doozy: 

One more time:

A correction was made on Sept. 11, 2025: An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement.

The quote the Times cited was Kirk reading the words of somebody else but the story attributed them to Charlie, because of course they did. 

And guess what -- even the correction is misleading: 

Advertisement

It does. 

Yeah, "errors" that only usually go in one direction aren't really honest mistakes. 

That part of the Times' story on Kirk was up long enough to give the Left another bogus talking point and the people spreading it won't bother to mention the correction. It's almost like that's all by design.

*****

Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives while running cover for the Democrats (looking at you, NY Times).

Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement