Jon Ossoff Goes Full Hillary and Says Trump Getting Elected Twice Signifies a...
Sick of Democrat Rule? Chicago Bears Bailing on Chicago and Mayor Brandon Johnson...
Democrat DISASTER --> Major Corporation Flees VA in Just 30 Days Under Governor...
Every Anti-ICE, Pro-Illegal Alien Dem Should Be Made to Comment on This Short...
Ted Lieu FREAKS After DOJ Calls Him OUT for DISGRACEFUL Epstein Files /Trump...
They DO Have Prince Andrew in the Can! Former Royal Arrested
Tim Kaine Passive-Aggressively (Politically) Reading the Book of Exodus for Lent Backfires...
Don Lemon Tells Jim Acosta MN Church Congregants Didn't Think He Was a...
Deported With a Baby and $190: Sam Stein Calls It 'Heinous' Cruelty, but...
Jill Filipovic Gets Salty: Babies Don't Need Two Parents If Mom Has Money...
Plot Twist! Transgender Hockey Shooter Allegedly Has an Arsonist Son (and Other Updates)
MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Learned the Truth About Talarico’s ‘Banned’ Interview But Pushed...
Dozens of Donalds: AI Video Offers a Peek at What Trump Would Look...
Is This What You Voted For? ICE Detains Husband After More Than 30...
Houston Chronicle: Anti-ICE Student Walkouts Were a ‘Fantastic Educational Experience’

NY Times' Issues a Doozy of a 'Correction' to Their Charlie Kirk Story (and It's STILL Misleading)

Meme

The New York Times has done it again.

Their obituary for Charlie Kirk was shameful enough, and in a separate story, titled "where Charlie Kirk stood on key political issues," the Times listed categories like climate change, race, free speech and antisemitism. 

Advertisement

In the Times' story about where Kirk stood, you won't be surprised to know that there were some inaccuracies, and they've now added a correction to the end of the story. This is a doozy: 

One more time:

A correction was made on Sept. 11, 2025: An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement.

The quote the Times cited was Kirk reading the words of somebody else but the story attributed them to Charlie, because of course they did. 

And guess what -- even the correction is misleading: 

Advertisement

It does. 

Yeah, "errors" that only usually go in one direction aren't really honest mistakes. 

That part of the Times' story on Kirk was up long enough to give the Left another bogus talking point and the people spreading it won't bother to mention the correction. It's almost like that's all by design.

*****

Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives while running cover for the Democrats (looking at you, NY Times).

Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement