Sen. Mark Kelly Posts Yet ANOTHER Video to Let Us Know He Won’t...
Cory Booker Says ‘ICE Was Here’ Nativity Sends Message That We’re All God’s...
Minneapolis Police Chief Says That Mary and Joseph Themselves Were Considered Outsiders
House Dems Introduce Resolution to Force Military to Stand Down Against Designated Terrori...
After Shooting at Hanukkah Event, Bernie Sanders Frets Over Islamophobia
Men Harass Officers Assigned to Track Down Child Predators, Mistaking Them for ICE
Tim Kaine: Robert E. Lee Statue in Capitol Replaced With Barbara Rose Johns
Asheville Vice Mayor Under Investigation for Voting in Both NC and Georgia Three...
Prodigal Elon Musk Returns to Trump White House Family in Time to Help...
War on Media! CNN’s Brian Stelter Fumes Trump Will Hold BBC Accountable for...
Tim Burchett Says Rubio and Hegseth Proved Democrats Went Overboard on Legal Narco-Terrori...
'Target Karen' Tries to Harass Worker Over Charlie Kirk Shirt; the Response Is...
Enemy Entry: Many Ask Why Susan Wiles Gave ‘Journo’ White House Access Knowing...
Adam Kinzinger Posts More Hypotheticals About Sydney Shooting and AR-15s
This Marine's Dream to Open a Cigar Lounge Was Shut Down by Government

Reports on judge halting Biden admin's ability to censor Americans go full state media

As we told you yesterday (early this morning, actually), Federal District Judge Terry A. Doughty giving America a gift on Independence Day by "granting a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. Biden, a landmark ruling vindicating freedom of expression for millions of Americans." 

Advertisement

The judge's ruling sounded an alarm about government efforts to censor: 

Doughty cited “substantial evidence” of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote that the “evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.’ ”

As you might have guessed, some of the media are reporting the story exactly like the Biden White House would like them to frame it, and we'll start with the New York Times:

Advertisement

Government efforts to "fight disinformation." 

"Fight disinformation"??

Never change, NY Times. 

But we know what happens to that when properly translated: 

It's just maddening that the media, after countless examples of the government's preferred narratives being exposed as false, continue to insist that those same people are the ones "fighting misinformation."

Advertisement

CNN's legal analyst said the judge's ruling ordering the Biden admin to stop working with social media companies was aggressive and far-reaching (irony alert):

Watching some in the American media criticize a ruling that clamps down on the government's ability to censor would be enough to make Orwell cringe.

Advertisement

Rolling Stone is of course again proving its counterculture cred by ::checks notes:: going with the gov't-approved spin on the story:

Nothing says "rock & roll" like defending Big Government censorship efforts.

*** 

Related:

BREAKING: Let freedom ring! Preliminary injunction granted to protect free speech in Missouri v. Biden

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement