Kamala Harris Says She and Biden Didn’t Release Epstein Files to Avoid Appearance...
Based on These Congressional Numbers From CNN the Dems Should DEFINITELY Keep Up...
Poor Choice of Words, Dave. LOL! David Axelrod Says AOC Has Something You...
No Monopoly on Grift: Haitians Give Somalis a Run for Their (Stolen) Money...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Innocent People DON'T Do This --> Whistleblowers Blow the Whistle AGAIN on Tim...
City in England Installs HVMs (Guess What That Stands for) in Effort to...
REALLY? Jon Karl Can't Remember a Primetime Presidential Speech That Was Hyperpartisan As...
Soros-Backed DA Drops Charges on Alleged Attempted Killer—He 'Finishes the Job' 24 Hours...
CNN Was Forced to Report Trump's Inflation Win, and It Was Glorious
NEWLY Released Radio Transmissions Show LEO Gave Brown University Shooter Lots of Time...
Chuck Schumer's Predictable Spin on Trump's Speech Gets Reality Nuked and Ratioed
Journo Claiming His Rent 'Went Up 24% Under Trump' BOLTS After Richard Grenell...
Britain's Plan to 'Protect Women' Targets Young White Boys Instead of Migrants Doing...
'Un Freakin' Real': Dem Rep's Argument Against Deporting Illegals Is PEAK Left Insanity

Reports on judge halting Biden admin's ability to censor Americans go full state media

As we told you yesterday (early this morning, actually), Federal District Judge Terry A. Doughty giving America a gift on Independence Day by "granting a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. Biden, a landmark ruling vindicating freedom of expression for millions of Americans." 

Advertisement

The judge's ruling sounded an alarm about government efforts to censor: 

Doughty cited “substantial evidence” of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote that the “evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.’ ”

As you might have guessed, some of the media are reporting the story exactly like the Biden White House would like them to frame it, and we'll start with the New York Times:

Advertisement

Government efforts to "fight disinformation." 

"Fight disinformation"??

Never change, NY Times. 

But we know what happens to that when properly translated: 

It's just maddening that the media, after countless examples of the government's preferred narratives being exposed as false, continue to insist that those same people are the ones "fighting misinformation."

Advertisement

CNN's legal analyst said the judge's ruling ordering the Biden admin to stop working with social media companies was aggressive and far-reaching (irony alert):

Watching some in the American media criticize a ruling that clamps down on the government's ability to censor would be enough to make Orwell cringe.

Advertisement

Rolling Stone is of course again proving its counterculture cred by ::checks notes:: going with the gov't-approved spin on the story:

Nothing says "rock & roll" like defending Big Government censorship efforts.

*** 

Related:

BREAKING: Let freedom ring! Preliminary injunction granted to protect free speech in Missouri v. Biden

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos