Owner of Tiny Variety Store Convicted of Trafficking $7 Million in Food Stamp...
Hot Take: Japanese-American Relations on Twitter Got a Lot Warmer
Townhall's Kurt Schlichter Says Not to Freak Out When We Lose the Birthright...
This Isn’t Asylum — It’s Why We Can’t Let Democrats Win Again
NASA Administrator Shares a Seriously Bada** Photo of the Artemis II Liftoff ('MERICA!)
Strong Voice Against Trumpism Notes Ivanka Trump Wasn’t a Citizen When She Gave...
The Verge Argues That the Artemis Moon Base Project Is 'Legally Dubious'
April Fool's Day Fun: Police Introduce Elite Unit of SAUSAGE Dogs
This Kid Gets It! One ... Ahem ... Outspoken Youngster Tells CNN Exactly...
Anti-ICE Activists on Patrol Approaching Cars and Demanding Badges, IDs, or Warrants
Former City Councilman Sentenced After Investigation Found 71 Voter Names Registered to Hi...
California's First Partner Wants to Hold Tech Leaders Responsible for 'Jordan Peterson-Typ...
Chuck Schumer Found a Way to Inject Anti-Trump Politics Into the Artemis II...
Laura Ingraham Says One Question Alone Indicates How Preposterous Justice KBJ’s Appointmen...
TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...

Reports on judge halting Biden admin's ability to censor Americans go full state media

As we told you yesterday (early this morning, actually), Federal District Judge Terry A. Doughty giving America a gift on Independence Day by "granting a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. Biden, a landmark ruling vindicating freedom of expression for millions of Americans." 

Advertisement

The judge's ruling sounded an alarm about government efforts to censor: 

Doughty cited “substantial evidence” of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote that the “evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.’ ”

As you might have guessed, some of the media are reporting the story exactly like the Biden White House would like them to frame it, and we'll start with the New York Times:

Advertisement

Government efforts to "fight disinformation." 

"Fight disinformation"??

Never change, NY Times. 

But we know what happens to that when properly translated: 

It's just maddening that the media, after countless examples of the government's preferred narratives being exposed as false, continue to insist that those same people are the ones "fighting misinformation."

Advertisement

CNN's legal analyst said the judge's ruling ordering the Biden admin to stop working with social media companies was aggressive and far-reaching (irony alert):

Watching some in the American media criticize a ruling that clamps down on the government's ability to censor would be enough to make Orwell cringe.

Advertisement

Rolling Stone is of course again proving its counterculture cred by ::checks notes:: going with the gov't-approved spin on the story:

Nothing says "rock & roll" like defending Big Government censorship efforts.

*** 

Related:

BREAKING: Let freedom ring! Preliminary injunction granted to protect free speech in Missouri v. Biden

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement