Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Asks Judge to Probe Phone Data of Holdout Juror
Democratic Socialist Says Conviction for Stealing Food Stamps Qualifies Her to Serve As...
Lawyer 'Hopes This Helps': Having a Final Order of Removal Is Not a...
Taylor Swift Shows Off the Ring After Kelce’s TD The Backlash Says More...
Maryland Man's 'Lynching' Ruled a Suicide, Disappointing Conspiracy Theorists and Politici...
The White House Just Put Out a Short Video Designed to Make Boycotting...
Mark Ruffalo Sad That Gavin Newsom Handed a Big Win to Trump and...
Fox News Joins CNN to Boycott Trump
Quiet Part Out Loud: Chris Murphy Declares That Dems Want to Control the...
Try Not to Laugh at This Headline About What the Media's Just Now...
It's Time to Fight Back Against Socialism
BRUTAL: People Are LOVING Ann Coulter SHREDDING 'Refugee' Ilhan Omar in This New...
Hasan Piker's REPUGNANT Treatment of Haley Stevens Shows Socialists Hate Democrats Most of...
Cleveland Rocks! Law Professor Sues Dearborn, Michigan for Discrimination Against Jews, Ch...
Jon Stewart Reminds Us How Dumb He REALLY Is in Unhinged Rant About...

WaPo reporter deletes quote of Sen. Fetterman that didn't quite match what he actually said

Yesterday at a Senate Committee hearing Sen. Jon Fetterman was having a lot of trouble conveying his question (to say the least) for a witness, but here’s how Washington Post White House economic reporter Jeff Stein quoted the Pennsylvania Democrat:

Advertisement

That tweet with a still photo was up for quite a while as many noticed that the quote was far from what Fetterman actually said.

If Fetterman was a Republican we’re pretty sure the tweeted quote would have been much closer to being accurate. Look at the Post reporter’s tweeted quote above and then compare it to what Fetterman actually said:


Is. Is it staggering? Is it a staggering a res uh responsibility that ju that a head of a bank could literally could literally crash our economy? It’s astonishing. That’s like if you have I mean like uh uh and and they also realizes that that that now they have it’s in-, in- guaranteed, a guaranteed way to be saved again by a no matter, by no mat, by, by how? You know, so it’s, it’s, you know isn’t it appropriate that the uh that those kind of controls should be were stricter? To prevent this kind of thing from willing? Or should we just go on start bailing and sailing whoever bank regardless of how, how raaaare rare theirs their conduct is?
Who you know I’ll give you an example. Uh, the republicans want to give a work requirement for SNAP. You know for a uh uh uh uh a hungry family has to have these this kind of penalties or these some kinds of wooooord or working uh require shouldn’t you have some kind of working required suu after we sail your bank uh billions of your bank? Because you seem we were preoccupied uh when uh then SNAP uh requirements for works for uh hungry people but not about pro, protecting the tax, tax papers you know that will bail them out of whatever does about a bank to crash it. ::shrugs:: Chair.

Advertisement

Yeah, that’s a little different, and after enough people pointed out that the original quote was wildly inaccurate, eventually the tweet was deleted.

And every day brings with it new examples of exactly that. Ah, “journalism”!

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement