Tim Walz Hysterically Rants Against 'Assault Weapons' ... But Cannot Define What One...
Pete Hegseth Praises WaPo for FINALLY Having an Accurate Headline (Attn. 'Seditious Six'!)
Popular Smote: Scott Jennings Zings Bakari Sellers With Truth About Hillary Clinton’s 2016...
Meritless Merrick: Mar-a-Lago Raid Revelations Show Garland Was Not Applying Law Evenly As...
Dem Chuck Schumer Says Obliterating Narco-Terrorists Who Poison Americans Really Turns His...
Sen. Mark Kelly Posts Yet ANOTHER Video to Let Us Know He Won’t...
Cory Booker Says ‘ICE Was Here’ Nativity Sends Message That We’re All God’s...
Minneapolis Police Chief Says That Mary and Joseph Themselves Were Considered Outsiders
House Dems Introduce Resolution to Force Military to Stand Down Against Designated Terrori...
After Shooting at Hanukkah Event, Bernie Sanders Frets Over Islamophobia
Men Harass Officers Assigned to Track Down Child Predators, Mistaking Them for ICE
Tim Kaine: Robert E. Lee Statue in Capitol Replaced With Barbara Rose Johns
Asheville Vice Mayor Under Investigation for Voting in Both NC and Georgia Three...
Prodigal Elon Musk Returns to Trump White House Family in Time to Help...
War on Media! CNN’s Brian Stelter Fumes Trump Will Hold BBC Accountable for...

Damage control! Allow GoFundMe to clarify something 'in light of the Rittenhouse trial' result

“Innocent until proven guilty” obviously doesn’t apply when it comes to GoFundMe’s policy in regards to attempts to use their service to raise defense funds for Kyle Rittenhouse. Now that he’s been acquitted, GoFundMe has clarified their policies:

Advertisement

GoFundMe turned off the replies for that one because they knew what it would bring.

Buck Sexton and others aren’t buying it:

Advertisement

GoFundMe’s policy seems a bit selective:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos