MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin’s Reaction to Dem’s Trump Hoax Photo Differs From Bill...
Clinton Spox (Hillary, Is That You?) Says Latest Batch of Epstein Pics Are...
President Trump Lowers Prescription Costs and Sends Warrior Dividends to the Troops
60 Minutes' Promo About Where ICE Sent These Deported Illegals Fails to Garner...
Carol Roth Lets These 2 Super Rich Guys Know How to Alleviate Their...
Is Michael Jordan Trolling You? MJ Has a Secret X Account to Rage-Bait...
Tim Walz's Attempted 'Release the Files' Dunk on Trump/DOJ Was a Self-Awareness Faceplant...
Scott Jennings Revisits CNN Clash With Dem Attorney Wildly Wrong About Judge Hannah...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Jim Acosta Reports Outside the Trump-Kennedy Center but Will NEVER Call It That...
U.S. Retaliates Against ISIS in Syria With Massive Airstrikes
Maria Shriver Gets a Lesson on 'Dignity' After Whining About the Trump-Kennedy Center
Buffet of Fresh News Breaking in Minnesota, Legacy Media is Reheating Leftovers From...
This Is the Way! Erika Kirk Rises Above the Hate, Trolls Joy Reid...
'PANIC MODE'! Tim Walz Says Trump's Weaponizing Federal Gov't Against MN Just Because...

CNN analyst has a Twitter rule about how to tell which people 'probably suck' (Jim Acosta among the hardest hit)

How can you tell which people “probably suck”? One New York Times reporter and CNN analyst has a general rule:

Advertisement

You know, he might be on to something:

That could spark a “Dear Diary” moment!

The president also might “probably suck,” according to the aforementioned rule:

If you look around Twitter much, there are a ton of people whose accounts fall into that category and it’s a bipartisan affair. But nobody fits the reporter’s tweet’s profile like Jim Acosta.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos