Conan O’Brien Jokes That at Least in Britain, They Arrest Their Pedophiles
TIME Lists Some of the Ways the Operation Epic Fury Money Could Have...
Cesar Chavez Too 'Problematic' Even for the Left? UFW Ditches Founder Amid Sexual...
Proposed Rule Could Ban Trump From Major International Events, Including the Olympics
Warner Goes From Calling Kent Dangerous to High-Fiving His Resignation – TDS Strikes...
Hearing a 27-Year-Old Mom Say She Feels Nothing for Her Baby Broke Me—Because...
Cato Director: Immigrants Reduce Crime Rates, So You’re Less Likely to Be a...
Talarico Goes Full Vegan: Because Nothing Screams 'Elect Me' Like Banning Brisket in...
California’s First Partner Says Don’t Listen to Bullies Like President Trump
Fairfax Schools Releases Worthless Statement Regarding Illegal Who Groped a Dozen Girls
Governor Newsom's Press Office Gets Ratioed INTO THE SUN by Nick Shirley (and...
Ireland’s New President Says ‘Patrick’ Reminds Us of the Courage and Resilience of...
NYT's Kristof Laments Iranian Butcher as 'Pragmatic Peace Partner' After Israel Takes Him...
Bodycam Video Released of Jasmine Crockett’s Bodyguard Pulling a Gun on Police
From Rolling Stone to NYT: Editor Accused of Shielding Friend in Child Porn...

CNN analyst has a Twitter rule about how to tell which people 'probably suck' (Jim Acosta among the hardest hit)

How can you tell which people “probably suck”? One New York Times reporter and CNN analyst has a general rule:

Advertisement

You know, he might be on to something:

That could spark a “Dear Diary” moment!

The president also might “probably suck,” according to the aforementioned rule:

If you look around Twitter much, there are a ton of people whose accounts fall into that category and it’s a bipartisan affair. But nobody fits the reporter’s tweet’s profile like Jim Acosta.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement