Everything is Political to the Left. LGBTQ Activists Turn Memorial for Nex Benedict...
BREAKING: Even Tech Billionaires Get The Microsoft Windows Blues
At This Point, It's Intentional. Chaya Raichik BLASTS LGBTQ Nonprofit Education Org for...
John Stossel Speaks With Reformed 'Climate Alarmist,' Exposes Total Corruption of the Move...
Mary Katharine Ham Rebukes Media for Hiding the Facts Around UGA Student Laken...
Say WHAT? Justin Trudeau Sends Millions to Ukraine for 'Gender Inclusive' Mine Removal
SIGH! Lying Liar Joe Biden Once Again 'Mispeaks' About His Extensive Travels with...
The Woman Known as 'Ballerina Farms' Is Not the Problem ... Your Envy...
Gov. Kristi Noem: '@JoeBiden Is Buying Votes'
SURE: Journalist Lamenting Days of 'Normal' Republicans Reminded of How Awful the Left...
Biden Receives Beginner's Class in MATH After Claiming US Inflation Lower Than Other...
Go HOME Google, You're Drunk: Megyn Kelly's Post ROASTING Google and Their Woke...
Law Prof Explains How Fani Willis' Terrible, Horrible, No-Good, Very-Bad Month is About...
Gosh, Golly, Gee, Can't Help But Notice AP Left Out an IMPORTANT Part...
Such GLORIOUS Shrieking! SNL Shares Shane Gillis' Hilarious Anti-Woke Monologue and Leftie...

'They literally tweeted it'! WaPo fact-checker slaps 'false' label on Trump's claim that W.H.O. said coronavirus 'not communicable' (and people have thoughts)

When President Trump announced that U.S. funding of the World Health Organization was being suspended, he said that in January WHO “parroted and publicly endorsed the idea that there was not human-to-human transmission happening despite reports and clear evidence to the contrary.”

Advertisement

Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler took on that claim, and, even if you’ve seen the WHO tweets from January, nevertheless came to this conclusion:

Oh really?

Here’s part of the Post’s conclusion, and it’s a parse-a-palooza:

But Trump really gets over his skis when he claims that the WHO “publicly endorsed the idea that there was not human-to-human transmission happening” and that the WHO said it was “not communicable.” The WHO said initially that there was “no clear evidence.” But by Jan. 14, a senior official said they could not rule out human-to-human transmission given the experience with SARS. That statement was made only two weeks after the WHO first learned of the new virus.

It’s almost a Four-Pinocchio claim but not quite. The WHO could have highlighted the human-to-human transmission sooner than it did and pressed China for more information. Trump, of course, could have done the same — and failed to do so, for weeks longer. Trump earns Three Pinocchios.

Advertisement

It seems that the WHO’s “no clear evidence” qualifier provided the fact-checker the out that was needed in order to label Trump’s statement as false, but not everybody’s buying it:

Advertisement

Does the Washington Post only employ completely objective, non-disingenuous journalists? There’s no clear evidence.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement