Is it unfair or biased in some way that some people have referred to Michael Brown as a “thug” and somebody like Jeffrey Dahmer was never referred to in the same way?
https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/525365222912303104
Fair point?
No, not really:
https://twitter.com/diezzzelll/status/525365388478263296
@ShaunKing Dahmer wasn't a thug, he was a psychopath.
— Hunter Zolomon (@_HeirJordan) October 23, 2014
https://twitter.com/AngeloMante/status/525366410827288576
@ShaunKing He was more of a Monster than a thug
— AstrO (@Mi_Astronauta) October 23, 2014
https://twitter.com/kkolumbo/status/525366203607683073
@ShaunKing there's a difference between a serial killer and a thug though, no serial killers were called thugs.
— Ricky (@raoiii) October 23, 2014
https://twitter.com/kylesnooze/status/525367037888303105
Because he's a mere sociopath. @ShaunKing: Jeffrey Dahmer, killed, raped & ate 17 men. NEVER was he called a thug http://t.co/3NvMAel9aU”
— Swank Sinatra (@SwankierSinatra) October 23, 2014
https://twitter.com/RobWerkheiser/status/525369555389280256
@ShaunKing I mean a murderous psychopath is a pretty horrendous ID. He was and always be known as a serial killer.
— Syn (@SyntheaL) October 23, 2014
Join the conversation as a VIP Member