Republicans wanted implementation of Obamacare delayed, so why aren’t they happy that the Obama administration is unilaterally and arbitrarily making changes to the law? The answer is obvious, but it’s a common talking point among flacks for the Obama administration:
.@igorvolsky No. We have repeatedly sought to have Obamacare delayed *via Congress.* There is an obvious and important difference.
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) December 20, 2013
.@igorvolsky did you not read what you wrote before you hit send?
— Savannah (@thesavvy) December 20, 2013
You're a writer and yet you completely missed the part where "all" does not equal "some," huh? https://t.co/RTw0tVYMwD @igorvolsky
— RBe (@RBPundit) December 20, 2013
Defending delays for “some” as being just as good as delays for “all” is unconvincing coming from the self-described party of “fairness”:
@RBPundit Good to know the Dems are the party of "some" Americans now. @igorvolsky
— Michael Blum (@MichaelBlum3) December 20, 2013
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.