His FACE! LOL! WATCH Democrat Andy Kim Duck, Dodge, and DIVE During CNN...
Dems Are Twisting Themselves Into DESPERATE Pretzels Defending Platner, HERE Are Some of...
What I Read About Platner's Wife AFTER She Defended Her Scumbag Husband Makes...
Just INSANELY Creepy: GUESS Which Democrat Thought Posting His Texts With a 13-YEAR-OLD...
HA! NO WAY? Forget Nazi Tat, Cheering Troops' Deaths & Sexting: THIS May...
STUNNER: Graham Platner STILL Maintains Creepy, Sexually Suggestive Profile on 'Predator's...
Think Graham Platner's Sexting Is Bad? Look at This Creepy Facebook Page, 'Cuz...
Former WaPo Editor Lois Romano Runs Cover for Graham Platner’s Lewd Sexts, Then...
Spencer Pratt Says He Ran for Office Out of Desperation and Necessity, Debating...
Ro Khanna Says Voting for the Laken Riley Act is Disqualifying for Any...
The Economist Offers Their Not-At-All Hot Take on Spencer Pratt
Sam Stein Thinks It’s Low Stakes to Vote for a Senator on Whether...
Platner Campaign Posts Video of Dem Candidate's Wife Making a Fresh 'Clean Up...
Woman Fired After Praying to ‘MAGA Lord Jesus’ to Make Pam Bondi’s Throat...
Scott Wiener Asks Who Would Campaign by Demonizing Children Who Just Want to...

Tammy Bruce spots a video that blows the excuse NYT floated for Sarah Jeong's racist tweets COMPLETELY out of the water

As Twitchy reported yesterday, after anti-“white people” tweets (and other hateful tweets) previously published by the New York Times’ newest editorial board member came to light, the paper came to her defense, explaining that she was defending herself:

Advertisement

So it was all in response to online “harassment”? Tammy Bruce spotted something that makes the Times’ excuse laughable:

It sure doesn’t look like Jeong’s responding to “online harassment” here (nor did it in most of her tweets, by the way):

STILL responding to online harassment, maybe? *Eye roll*

That might be the Times’ follow-up excuse.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos