https://twitter.com/GlomarResponder/status/786972411338121216
There’s really only one word for it:
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/786967230139527168
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/786967557676929024
Yep. Brace yourselves:
BREAKING: 9th Circuit upholds CA law forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to inform clients how they can obtain abortions
— Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) October 14, 2016
Nothing is surprising anymore.
the downward spiral of moral decay is rapidly increasing in speed.
— Rick Menasco (@rmenasco) October 14, 2016
Why stop there? Babies R Us should have a mini Planned Parenthood branch next to the diaper aisle. https://t.co/ReYPJnYYez
— NeoN: Automataster (@neontaster) October 14, 2016
Is there a lawyer that can explain the the pretzel logic used by the 9th to come to this decision?@Popehat ? https://t.co/cXFKFXr3yH
— Fusilli Spock (@awstar11) October 14, 2016
Immoral and blatantly unconstitutional. https://t.co/mrgwi9Wpe3
— Stephen Gutowski (@StephenGutowski) October 14, 2016
https://twitter.com/BRI_Investor/status/786977617249439744
I can't begin to fathom how this is possibly Constitutional https://t.co/cXFKFXr3yH
— Fusilli Spock (@awstar11) October 14, 2016
https://twitter.com/CaseyMattox_/status/786970876067602433
then they should inform them in true, horrifying detail.
— Craig Counts (@CraigCounts) October 14, 2016
Supreme Court nominee just became more of an election issue now
— Chris Courtney (@ChrisCourtney9) October 14, 2016
Farewell, first amendment. It was nice to know you. https://t.co/4CIYIsBvtQ
— Andrew Koenig (@arks_remarks) October 14, 2016
Questions of the day:
@WardDPatrick Are abortion providers required to provide information on pro life services ?
— Gayle (@glgarner3) October 14, 2016
https://twitter.com/BurgerVonStadt/status/786974154666967040
Join the conversation as a VIP Member