Jill Abramson is out as executive editor of the New York Times.

According to a New Yorker article, one possible contributing factor was that Abramson had become upset after discovering that her pay and benefits were “considerably less” than that of her predecessor, Bill Keller:

Just last month, the Times ran an editorial titled “The Truth About the Pay Gap.”

NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik offered a good rundown of the Abramson story, including a confirmation that Abramson discovered she was being paid less than her male predecessor:

Folkenflik confirmed the New Yorker report that Abramson left over a pay and benefits dispute:

Does the New York Times publisher have some explaining to do?

It could be a rough week for some New York Times execs.

Update:

Ha!

***

Related:

‘How great is this?!’ Jim Geraghty reminds NYT of headline they can re-use for Jill Abramson story

‘War on women is coming from inside the house!’ John Ekdahl re-tweets NYT pay equity sanctimony