USA Today Tries to Prop Up Biden's Final 'Legacy' With the SOFTEST of...
Worst Case Scenario: High Winds and Lack of Water Hamper Firefighters in California
Rep. Kevin Kiley Has Maddening Examples of How Taxpayers Are Being Fleeced by...
'Stupidest Tweet Ever Written'! Eric Swalwell Wants to Know Trump's Plan to Bring...
The Left Wasn't REALLY Mad at Bruce Fischer, They Just Took Their Impotent...
GIGANTIC Face Plant: New York Times Headline on Meta's 'Fact-Checkers' Is Unintentional Hi...
Conservative Media SLAM DUNK! Salem Media Announces Brad Parscale As New Chief of...
Thanks But No Thanks: Two Murderers Granted Clemency By Biden Sue to Stay...
Harrowing Video Shows Men and Dog Trapped Inside Home Surrounded by California Wildfires
Kamala Harris to Enjoy Taxpayer-Funded ‘Biden Accomplishments’ Vacation Before Leaving Off...
MSNBC’s Joy Reid and Mehdi Hasan Go After Elon Musk for Exposing Muslim...
Well, Water You Think of That? Trump Wants to Rename Gulf of Mexico...
No More Apologies! Scott Jennings Explains Trump’s Vision of an Expansive Superpower Ameri...
Americans Over Illegal Aliens: Fetterman Pleads With Senate Democrats to Pass Laken Riley...
CNN’s Dana Bash Misleads Viewers Trump’s Planning Military Invasions of Greenland, Canada...

Politifact rates spox's prediction about Trump's electoral vote total on election night as 'impossible' (guess why)

Trump campaign spokesman Jason Miller has made an electoral vote prediction about tomorrow’s election:

Advertisement

The crack “fact-checkers” at Politifact were all over that claim, and it wouldn’t have been correct no matter what number Miller predicted. Here’s why:

Is that really a “fact check”?

It’s almost impossible to tell the difference on some days.

Advertisement

Politifact had to twist a bit to get there but they managed to turn themselves into a pretzel to rule that prediction as “impossible,” and therefore false.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement